you can't make this stuff up
Comments
-
Giant harmonica? I don't get it
I am the Troll Jesus. Follow me, my children, or clutch your pearls tightly.
@ScotchnSmoke still sux lots of large wéiners. And tons of small ones.2 -
@VegasFrank said:
Giant harmonica? I don't get itDumpster came off the truck
1 -
13 -
The anonymous creator of bitcoin, that is only known as Satoshi Nakamoto, now has over $134 billion in bitcoin. Still no one knows who he or she actually is.
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
2 -
I'd sell it off.
Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.
2 -
Penn State lost to NORTHWESTERN
and Indiana just beat OregonIf it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
2 -
Rub it in man, rub it in.
2 -
If you pass by a café that operates a Wi-Fi network, you can be identified—even if you do not carry a smartphone with you. Researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have found out that it is possible to identify people solely through Wi-Fi signals. They point out that this constitutes a significant risk to privacy.
To infer the identity of people, it is no longer necessary that they carry a smartphone or tablet on them. It takes nothing but Wi-Fi devices communicating with one another in the person's surroundings. This creates an image comparable to a camera shot, but based on radio waves. The research team calls for adequate privacy safeguards.
"By observing the propagation of radio waves, we can create an image of the surroundings and of persons there," says Professor Thorsten Strufe from KASTEL—KIT's Institute of Information Security and Dependability. "This works similarly to a normal camera, the difference being that in our case, radio waves instead of light waves are transformed into an image," explains the cybersecurity expert.
"Thus, it does not matter whether you carry a Wi-Fi device on you or not." Even switching a device off does not help: "It's sufficient that other Wi-Fi devices in your surroundings are active."
0 -
@silvermouse said:
If you pass by a café that operates a Wi-Fi network, you can be identified—even if you do not carry a smartphone with you. Researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have found out that it is possible to identify people solely through Wi-Fi signals. They point out that this constitutes a significant risk to privacy.To infer the identity of people, it is no longer necessary that they carry a smartphone or tablet on them. It takes nothing but Wi-Fi devices communicating with one another in the person's surroundings. This creates an image comparable to a camera shot, but based on radio waves. The research team calls for adequate privacy safeguards.
"By observing the propagation of radio waves, we can create an image of the surroundings and of persons there," says Professor Thorsten Strufe from KASTEL—KIT's Institute of Information Security and Dependability. "This works similarly to a normal camera, the difference being that in our case, radio waves instead of light waves are transformed into an image," explains the cybersecurity expert.
"Thus, it does not matter whether you carry a Wi-Fi device on you or not." Even switching a device off does not help: "It's sufficient that other Wi-Fi devices in your surroundings are active."
Don't even know how to take this.
0 -
AI, our future master knows what you look.like and where you are.
Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.
0 -
They’ve been using this technology and a form of radar/sonar to map the inside of building from above for years.
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
1 -
Minority report.
"If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed. If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." -- Mark Twain0 -
Check out all the Hacking Conferences and past ones and see we have no security or little at best..
0 -
Holy Moly, I wanted it, but never expected it to happen. I guess when the adult fan base (non-students) have turned on you, the Athletic Department's main concern becomes avoiding the blame, which would soon have turned on them if they did nothing. I wonder what happens to Jim Knowles, who for the past three weeks has seemed to still be on Ohio State's payroll.
ETA: I'm reading it's a $48M buyout, even so, I guess Lame Game James will be OK until he secures a new gig.
1 -
@TRayB said:
Holy Moly, I wanted it, but never expected it to happen. I guess when the adult fan base (non-students) have turned on you, the Athletic Department's main concern becomes avoiding the blame, which would soon have turned on them if they did nothing. I wonder what happens to Jim Knowles, who for the past three weeks has seemed to still be on Ohio State's payroll.
ETA: I'm reading it's a $48M buyout, even so, I guess Lame Game James will be OK until he secures a new gig.
Yeah, I had heard several different ones previously. Everything from 50-70 was said. Looks like it’s just shy of 50 which should be more than enough for him to drift away into obscurity like he should.
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
0 -
@Rdp77 said:
@TRayB said:
Holy Moly, I wanted it, but never expected it to happen. I guess when the adult fan base (non-students) have turned on you, the Athletic Department's main concern becomes avoiding the blame, which would soon have turned on them if they did nothing. I wonder what happens to Jim Knowles, who for the past three weeks has seemed to still be on Ohio State's payroll.
ETA: I'm reading it's a $48M buyout, even so, I guess Lame Game James will be OK until he secures a new gig.
Yeah, I had heard several different ones previously. Everything from 50-70 was said. Looks like it’s just shy of 50 which should be more than enough for him to drift away into obscurity like he should.
He will be a head coach again, no doubt, probably after a stint in broadcasting.
0 -
@silvermouse said:
If you pass by a café that operates a Wi-Fi network, you can be identified—even if you do not carry a smartphone with you. Researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have found out that it is possible to identify people solely through Wi-Fi signals. They point out that this constitutes a significant risk to privacy.To infer the identity of people, it is no longer necessary that they carry a smartphone or tablet on them. It takes nothing but Wi-Fi devices communicating with one another in the person's surroundings. This creates an image comparable to a camera shot, but based on radio waves. The research team calls for adequate privacy safeguards.
"By observing the propagation of radio waves, we can create an image of the surroundings and of persons there," says Professor Thorsten Strufe from KASTEL—KIT's Institute of Information Security and Dependability. "This works similarly to a normal camera, the difference being that in our case, radio waves instead of light waves are transformed into an image," explains the cybersecurity expert.
"Thus, it does not matter whether you carry a Wi-Fi device on you or not." Even switching a device off does not help: "It's sufficient that other Wi-Fi devices in your surroundings are active."
It also occurs with digital TV and radio waves. It's big in defense. It's called passive coherent location.
I am the Troll Jesus. Follow me, my children, or clutch your pearls tightly.
@ScotchnSmoke still sux lots of large wéiners. And tons of small ones.2 -
Scrapple sculpting contest last week in Philly. They gave each participant five pounds of scrapple.
Join us on Zoom vHerf (Meeting # 2619860114 Password vHerf2020 )2 -
Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.
Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.
0 -
I am all for conservation, ours is the only house on the street that encourages wildlfe. But then there is this, from Semafor:
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a snail
The Western world is in the grip of a housing crisis, and the best way to fix a housing crisis is to build more houses. But much of the West is limited in its ability to do that, because interest groups are able to use existing legislation to prevent their building. A good example, says the former British civil servant Michael Dnes, is the case of the little whirlpool ramshorn snail. They are rare, and thus protected under British law, and all construction near a colony must take them into account. Dnes has previously written about a stretch of road that has been denied important safety work for years — a period during which six people have died on that road — because of the snails.
Now, he writes, the presence of the snails in a valley in the southeast of England has led to a block on the construction of 20,000 new homes. The valley itself will not be built on; the concern is simply that building homes nearby might reduce the amount of water that reaches the valley. Any project, in an area of 350 square miles home to 250,000 people, must prove that it will not create any more water demand, in case it dries out the snails; simply bringing in more water, perhaps via a pipe, will not do. “No one appears to have stood up and said ARE YOU COMPLETELY INSANE!?!,” says Dnes. “Which seems like a missed opportunity.”
4 -
-
@Rdp77 said:
The anonymous creator of bitcoin, that is only known as Satoshi Nakamoto, now has over $134 billion in bitcoin. Still no one knows who he or she actually is.Back in the early days some guy thought he’d be cool and pay for 2 $10 pizzas with bitcoin. Today those pizzas would be worth $6 million.
5 -
@Rhamlin said:
@Rdp77 said:
The anonymous creator of bitcoin, that is only known as Satoshi Nakamoto, now has over $134 billion in bitcoin. Still no one knows who he or she actually is.Back in the early days some guy thought he’d be cool and pay for 2 $10 pizzas with bitcoin. Today those pizzas would be worth $6 million.
From what I’ve read they might have been a few days ago, but not today. Crypto took an $800 billion market capitalization hit on 24 hours
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
1 -
LOL, Don't blame you. Many old-timers do everything. We throw the bone in to a Vat type thing and simmer over fire for several hours. Go through it to remove the bones and such and then make it. You can add as much or as little of the pig as you want. Sort of like hot dogs.
0









https://youtu.be/QLyJOkWLYGU?si=5EYoMa2exlIGY0uD

