you can't make this stuff up

1269270271272274

Comments

  • Itsfine
    Itsfine Posts: 20,692 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Giant harmonica? I don't get it

    I am the Troll Jesus. Follow me, my children, or clutch your pearls tightly.

    @ScotchnSmoke still sux lots of large wéiners. And tons of small ones. 
  • WolfHunter909_
    WolfHunter909_ Posts: 130 ✭✭✭

    @VegasFrank said:
    Giant harmonica? I don't get it

    Dumpster came off the truck

  • Rdp77
    Rdp77 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The anonymous creator of bitcoin, that is only known as Satoshi Nakamoto, now has over $134 billion in bitcoin. Still no one knows who he or she actually is.

    If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.

  • ShawnOL
    ShawnOL Posts: 13,699 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd sell it off.

    Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.

  • Rdp77
    Rdp77 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Penn State lost to NORTHWESTERN
    and Indiana just beat Oregon

    If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.

  • TRayB
    TRayB Posts: 3,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rub it in man, rub it in.

  • silvermouse
    silvermouse Posts: 23,742 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you pass by a café that operates a Wi-Fi network, you can be identified—even if you do not carry a smartphone with you. Researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have found out that it is possible to identify people solely through Wi-Fi signals. They point out that this constitutes a significant risk to privacy.

    To infer the identity of people, it is no longer necessary that they carry a smartphone or tablet on them. It takes nothing but Wi-Fi devices communicating with one another in the person's surroundings. This creates an image comparable to a camera shot, but based on radio waves. The research team calls for adequate privacy safeguards.

    "By observing the propagation of radio waves, we can create an image of the surroundings and of persons there," says Professor Thorsten Strufe from KASTEL—KIT's Institute of Information Security and Dependability. "This works similarly to a normal camera, the difference being that in our case, radio waves instead of light waves are transformed into an image," explains the cybersecurity expert.

    "Thus, it does not matter whether you carry a Wi-Fi device on you or not." Even switching a device off does not help: "It's sufficient that other Wi-Fi devices in your surroundings are active."

    https://share.google/Z2YI6UqN9gIgIyGcD

  • edz
    edz Posts: 416 ✭✭✭✭

    @silvermouse said:
    If you pass by a café that operates a Wi-Fi network, you can be identified—even if you do not carry a smartphone with you. Researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have found out that it is possible to identify people solely through Wi-Fi signals. They point out that this constitutes a significant risk to privacy.

    To infer the identity of people, it is no longer necessary that they carry a smartphone or tablet on them. It takes nothing but Wi-Fi devices communicating with one another in the person's surroundings. This creates an image comparable to a camera shot, but based on radio waves. The research team calls for adequate privacy safeguards.

    "By observing the propagation of radio waves, we can create an image of the surroundings and of persons there," says Professor Thorsten Strufe from KASTEL—KIT's Institute of Information Security and Dependability. "This works similarly to a normal camera, the difference being that in our case, radio waves instead of light waves are transformed into an image," explains the cybersecurity expert.

    "Thus, it does not matter whether you carry a Wi-Fi device on you or not." Even switching a device off does not help: "It's sufficient that other Wi-Fi devices in your surroundings are active."

    https://share.google/Z2YI6UqN9gIgIyGcD

    Don't even know how to take this.

  • ShawnOL
    ShawnOL Posts: 13,699 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AI, our future master knows what you look.like and where you are.

    Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.

  • Rdp77
    Rdp77 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They’ve been using this technology and a form of radar/sonar to map the inside of building from above for years.

    If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.

  • Amos_Umwhat
    Amos_Umwhat Posts: 9,944 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Minority report.

    "If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed.  If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." --  Mark Twain
  • WolfHunter909_
    WolfHunter909_ Posts: 130 ✭✭✭

    Check out all the Hacking Conferences and past ones and see we have no security or little at best..

  • Rdp77
    Rdp77 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 12

    @TRayB said:
    Rub it in man, rub it in.

    They actually fired him 😳
    $50 million buyout too so the boosters must have really been fed up

    If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.

  • TRayB
    TRayB Posts: 3,823 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 12

    @Rdp77 said:

    @TRayB said:
    Rub it in man, rub it in.

    They actually fired him 😳
    $70 million buyout too so the boosters must have really been fed up

    Holy Moly, I wanted it, but never expected it to happen. I guess when the adult fan base (non-students) have turned on you, the Athletic Department's main concern becomes avoiding the blame, which would soon have turned on them if they did nothing. I wonder what happens to Jim Knowles, who for the past three weeks has seemed to still be on Ohio State's payroll.

    ETA: I'm reading it's a $48M buyout, even so, I guess Lame Game James will be OK until he secures a new gig.

  • Rdp77
    Rdp77 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TRayB said:

    @Rdp77 said:

    @TRayB said:
    Rub it in man, rub it in.

    They actually fired him 😳
    $70 million buyout too so the boosters must have really been fed up

    Holy Moly, I wanted it, but never expected it to happen. I guess when the adult fan base (non-students) have turned on you, the Athletic Department's main concern becomes avoiding the blame, which would soon have turned on them if they did nothing. I wonder what happens to Jim Knowles, who for the past three weeks has seemed to still be on Ohio State's payroll.

    ETA: I'm reading it's a $48M buyout, even so, I guess Lame Game James will be OK until he secures a new gig.

    Yeah, I had heard several different ones previously. Everything from 50-70 was said. Looks like it’s just shy of 50 which should be more than enough for him to drift away into obscurity like he should.

    If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.

  • TRayB
    TRayB Posts: 3,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rdp77 said:

    @TRayB said:

    @Rdp77 said:

    @TRayB said:
    Rub it in man, rub it in.

    They actually fired him 😳
    $70 million buyout too so the boosters must have really been fed up

    Holy Moly, I wanted it, but never expected it to happen. I guess when the adult fan base (non-students) have turned on you, the Athletic Department's main concern becomes avoiding the blame, which would soon have turned on them if they did nothing. I wonder what happens to Jim Knowles, who for the past three weeks has seemed to still be on Ohio State's payroll.

    ETA: I'm reading it's a $48M buyout, even so, I guess Lame Game James will be OK until he secures a new gig.

    Yeah, I had heard several different ones previously. Everything from 50-70 was said. Looks like it’s just shy of 50 which should be more than enough for him to drift away into obscurity like he should.

    He will be a head coach again, no doubt, probably after a stint in broadcasting.

  • Itsfine
    Itsfine Posts: 20,692 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 13

    @silvermouse said:
    If you pass by a café that operates a Wi-Fi network, you can be identified—even if you do not carry a smartphone with you. Researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have found out that it is possible to identify people solely through Wi-Fi signals. They point out that this constitutes a significant risk to privacy.

    To infer the identity of people, it is no longer necessary that they carry a smartphone or tablet on them. It takes nothing but Wi-Fi devices communicating with one another in the person's surroundings. This creates an image comparable to a camera shot, but based on radio waves. The research team calls for adequate privacy safeguards.

    "By observing the propagation of radio waves, we can create an image of the surroundings and of persons there," says Professor Thorsten Strufe from KASTEL—KIT's Institute of Information Security and Dependability. "This works similarly to a normal camera, the difference being that in our case, radio waves instead of light waves are transformed into an image," explains the cybersecurity expert.

    "Thus, it does not matter whether you carry a Wi-Fi device on you or not." Even switching a device off does not help: "It's sufficient that other Wi-Fi devices in your surroundings are active."

    https://share.google/Z2YI6UqN9gIgIyGcD

    It also occurs with digital TV and radio waves. It's big in defense. It's called passive coherent location.

    I am the Troll Jesus. Follow me, my children, or clutch your pearls tightly.

    @ScotchnSmoke still sux lots of large wéiners. And tons of small ones. 
  • Yakster
    Yakster Posts: 31,858 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Scrapple sculpting contest last week in Philly. They gave each participant five pounds of scrapple.

    https://youtu.be/QLyJOkWLYGU?si=5EYoMa2exlIGY0uD

    Join us on Zoom vHerf (Meeting # 2619860114 Password vHerf2020 )
  • ShawnOL
    ShawnOL Posts: 13,699 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.

  • peter4jc
    peter4jc Posts: 18,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ShawnOL said:
    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    "Everything but the oink"

    "I could've had a Mi Querida!"   Nick Bardis
  • edz
    edz Posts: 416 ✭✭✭✭

    @ShawnOL said:
    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    Check out Pon Haus as well, pretty good fried with some eggs

  • silvermouse
    silvermouse Posts: 23,742 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am all for conservation, ours is the only house on the street that encourages wildlfe. But then there is this, from Semafor:

    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a snail

    The Western world is in the grip of a housing crisis, and the best way to fix a housing crisis is to build more houses. But much of the West is limited in its ability to do that, because interest groups are able to use existing legislation to prevent their building. A good example, says the former British civil servant Michael Dnes, is the case of the little whirlpool ramshorn snail. They are rare, and thus protected under British law, and all construction near a colony must take them into account. Dnes has previously written about a stretch of road that has been denied important safety work for years — a period during which six people have died on that road — because of the snails.

    Now, he writes, the presence of the snails in a valley in the southeast of England has led to a block on the construction of 20,000 new homes. The valley itself will not be built on; the concern is simply that building homes nearby might reduce the amount of water that reaches the valley. Any project, in an area of 350 square miles home to 250,000 people, must prove that it will not create any more water demand, in case it dries out the snails; simply bringing in more water, perhaps via a pipe, will not do. “No one appears to have stood up and said ARE YOU COMPLETELY INSANE!?!,” says Dnes. “Which seems like a missed opportunity.”

  • Amos_Umwhat
    Amos_Umwhat Posts: 9,944 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @edz said:

    @ShawnOL said:
    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    Check out Pon Haus as well, pretty good fried with some eggs

    Be sure to spell it correctly.

    "If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed.  If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." --  Mark Twain
  • Rdp77
    Rdp77 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rhamlin said:

    @Rdp77 said:
    The anonymous creator of bitcoin, that is only known as Satoshi Nakamoto, now has over $134 billion in bitcoin. Still no one knows who he or she actually is.

    Back in the early days some guy thought he’d be cool and pay for 2 $10 pizzas with bitcoin. Today those pizzas would be worth $6 million.

    From what I’ve read they might have been a few days ago, but not today. Crypto took an $800 billion market capitalization hit on 24 hours

    If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.

  • Vision
    Vision Posts: 10,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TRayB said:

    @ShawnOL said:
    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    I don't eat anything with crap in the middle.

    It’s not that bad. A shower before hand is always a must.

  • edz
    edz Posts: 416 ✭✭✭✭

    @TRayB said:

    @ShawnOL said:
    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    I don't eat anything with crap in the middle.

    LOL, Don't blame you. Many old-timers do everything. We throw the bone in to a Vat type thing and simmer over fire for several hours. Go through it to remove the bones and such and then make it. You can add as much or as little of the pig as you want. Sort of like hot dogs.

  • TRayB
    TRayB Posts: 3,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Vision said:

    @TRayB said:

    @ShawnOL said:
    Had to Google scrapple. Interesting.

    I don't eat anything with crap in the middle.

    It’s not that bad. A shower before hand is always a must.

    Ewwww, you're gross.