you can't make this stuff up
Comments
-
-
Does it work on other body parts?
I don't have problems, just more work to do.
2 -
-
Ambient Longevity: What If Your Life Was Already Measuring Your Health?
What if the data needed to guide you toward a longer, healthier, happier life already existed… and nobody was using it?
That’s the premise behind Ambient Longevity. Not a new device. Not another dashboard. A continuous, personal health intelligence that monitors and analyzes the data your life already generates, and uses it to guide you toward your objectives, in real time, without adding friction.
Imagine if we could stop asking patients to reorganize their lives around their health. Instead, embed health intelligence into the life they’re already living.
What It Could Look Like
Five layers of data (most of which already exist) feeding one unified model:
Biology. Your genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and routine biomarkers: from annual panels to imaging etc. Thats the foundation.
Lifestyle. Already measured by wearables and devices you own. Sleep, HRV, activity, recovery, VO2 estimates. Oura, Whoop, Apple Watch, Garmin they’re collecting it. But they dont unify.
Behaviors. How you eat, what you buy, how you move through your day, your social patterns, your screen time. Apple, Amazon, Google, and your phone already know this in extraordinary resolution.
Environmental. Light exposure, EMF, PM2.5, PFAS levels, water quality, air quality, UV index. We measure all of it. We just don’t connect it to individual health trajectories.
Life milestones and goals. Your voice, your intentions, your life stage. Are you training for a marathon or recovering from a divorce? Planning a pregnancy or navigating menopause? The same biomarkers mean different things depending on what you’re optimizing for.
What It Does
Once these layers are unified, Ambient Longevity drafts personalized recommendations based on your objectives, not generic population averages. And it deploys specialized agents to guide execution:
A mental health agent that tracks mood patterns, stress markers, and cognitive load
A physical performance agent that adapts training to recovery, sleep, and biological age
A nutrition agent that adjusts recommendations based on what’s actually in your kitchen, your metabolic response, and your goals
A travel and environment agent that anticipates jet lag, altitude changes, air quality shifts, and adjusts protocols before you feel the impact
You get it you could train agents to provide n-of-1 guidance.The Key Insight
This data already exists. It sits in Google, Amazon, Oura, Whoop, your EMR, your banking app, your calendar. What didn’t exist was a way to analyze it in real time, across all domains, for one individual.
Today, it does. And it does it better than any human could. Not because AI is smarter than physicians, but because no physician can monitor five data layers continuously, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, and adjust recommendations in real time.
The Hard Question
If the data exists and the technology works, the question isn’t technical. It’s ethical. How do we make it ethical? The data must serve the individual, not the platform. Your health model should be proprietary to you, not owned by a corporation monetizing your biology.
How do we make it equitable? The current longevity model serves the wealthy. Ambient Longevity runs on infrastructure that already reaches billions. It doesn’t require concierge memberships or $10,000 panels. It requires a new philosophy about whose interests the data should serve.
How do we keep it controlled by the individual? Open-source models., decentralized architecture, federated learning… where your data trains your model locally without ever leaving your device. No central database. No corporate ownership. Your biology, your intelligence, your control.
Ambient Longevity isn’t the future. The data exists. The AI exists. The infrastructure exists. What’s missing is the commitment to making personal health intelligence ethical, equitable, and individually controlled. When knoledge and data become ubiquitous, the predict physician could bring wisdom, experience, and guidance.
3 -
callers to the Washington State Department of Licensing who had selected the Spanish-language service were patched through to an AI speaking Spanish-accented English
3 -
If in the next decade or two you notice that everyone around you is significantly less intelligent and even worse at critical thinking than they are today, you can blame AI. Because if you give an entire generation of kids the ability to magically do their homework at the push of a button, they’re going to smash it to bits.
New research from the Pew Research Center found that AI has created a fundamental shift in how younger generations are processing information, and it’s mostly that they aren’t processing it at all and are leaving it up to an AI chatbot.
According to the survey of teens aged 13 to 17, a deeply concerning 54 percent now admit to using AI for “homework help,” a nebulous term that ranges from legitimate tutoring to just blatantly using it to do their assignments for them. Only 45 percent of students claim to be staying away from AI entirely. The biggest group to keep our eyes on, and probably the ones that will be ruining our collective lives in the future, are the 10 percent of respondents who report using AI for “all or most” of their assignments.
AI Is Hitting Low-Income Gen Alpha Students the Hardest
The study found that minority and low-income students are significantly more likely to lean on these tools for school work. Specifically, 20 percent of students in households earning less than $30,000 a year use AI for all or most of their work, compared to just seven percent of kids in households making over $75,000 a year. Race plays a big factor. Black and Hispanic teens are 12 percent more likely than their white peers to outsource a majority of their school work to a chatbot.While the AI is probably making the kids look smarter than they actually are, and thus possibly getting better grades than they normally would, that’s the problem. There is very likely going to be a significant proportion of younger people who slip through the US educational system, graduate high school, breeze through college, and make it out into the real world without having developed any of the skills necessary to survive because they offloaded all the trials and tribulations that forge actual, practically applicable intelligence.
With little to no regulations on the way, things are looking grim for the future of American critical thinking skills.
3 -
It’s not just younger generations, and I completely disagree with it affecting minorities or low income people more. AI is the cause of so many “white collar” workers losing jobs. They’ve been relying on it for a few years now and with companies realizing the cost effectiveness of using a computer to cut out the middle man people are being left out.
As far as students, I just find it hard to believe that it affects minorities or low income more in that aspect either. Why would it? White kids aren’t looking to improve their grades? Rich kids don’t want an easier way to make better grades?
Fact of the matter is, we have a generation coming up that was raised by the internet as a babysitter and younger parents that have been taught by the internet that it’s better to be a child’s friend than their parent. Critical thinking is too hard for these generations because the internet has taught them they should be able to do everything the easy way. To let someone else think for them. It doesn’t have anything to do with race or income. It has to do with the societal loss of morality.
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
2 -
Are you saying that is what you would like to think or are you disputing the numbers?
0 -
Was that written by AI
A little dirt never hurt5 -
@dirtdude said:
Was that written by AIHere's the undigested research, minus the editorial opinions in the precis I first quoted:
0 -
@silvermouse said:
Are you saying that is what you would like to think or are you disputing the numbers?Numbers are easily skewed to form statistics….
I can go to the local high school and do the survey. 98% of the kids are white. The numbers would be the opposite. Same if we did it in a predominantly Asian school.
I guess what I’d like to think is that contrary to what many want us all to believe…not everything is about race.
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
1 -
In reading the results from studies, I think there are things known as 'confounding factors', things that are supposed to be taken into account because they can confound the outcomes and make the studies less reliable. I'm too uninterested/lazy to dig into this one, but I'm guessing there are a lot of factors that were unaccounted for.
"I could've had a Mi Querida!" Nick Bardis3 -
2 -
My take would be that it affects poor people and minorities more, because it affects households without 2 active parents. Single mothers aren't always home to make the kid sit down at the kitchen table and finish their homework without their phone, before they go play video games or whatever. Single parenthood and poverty are also directly correlated in some fashion. Some say single parenthood causes poverty, and others say that poverty causes single parenthood, but regardless, they're inarguably related to each other. I would love to see that data split up into 1 parent vs 2 parent households.
5 -
super.
"Macron didn't disclose how many warheads will be added—Deutsche Welle notes the current figure hovers around 290—but he warned that "the next half-century will be an age of nuclear weapons." "
1 -
I was actually surprised when I read that France was the only EU country with nukes
If it don’t bother me, it don’t bother me. Just leave me alone.
2 -
@CalvinAndHobo said:
My take would be that it affects poor people and minorities more, because it affects households without 2 active parents. Single mothers aren't always home to make the kid sit down at the kitchen table and finish their homework without their phone, before they go play video games or whatever. Single parenthood and poverty are also directly correlated in some fashion. Some say single parenthood causes poverty, and others say that poverty causes single parenthood, but regardless, they're inarguably related to each other. I would love to see that data split up into 1 parent vs 2 parent households.Think this also adds to medical problems from stress, not being able to take time off when needed, constructive time with children.
3 -
$170 million
— That is how much Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan spent on an unfinished waterfront compound on an island north of Miami that locals call the “Billionaires’ Bunker.” It is the most expensive sale in the history of Miami-Dade County.1 -
@Rdp77 said:
I was actually surprised when I read that France was the only EU country with nukesWell, historically speaking, the German speaking peoples have difficulty exercising power and restraint simultaneously. So, that might explain some of it.
"If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed. If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." -- Mark Twain3 -
2 -
His momma must be so proud. 👆
Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.
4 -
I hope he was kidding:
A far-right conspiracy theorist turned high-ranking official at the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) claims to have once teleported to a Waffle House.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/20/fema-gregg-phillips-waffle-house
0
