C.COM Newsletter
laker1963
Posts: 5,046
Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
0
Comments
-
Yea, I got the email too but it appears the Jan 2 newsletter isnt up yet. I've been checking it all morning. I want to read the Greycliff reveiw. I love that cigar!! Hope it's posted soon.0
-
I thought it was just me. I tried several times to read some of the articles, but it kept going back to the 12/19 issue. My kids tell me I'm an analog guy in a digital world.0
-
I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weekslaker1963:Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.0 -
This happened with the last newsletter, at least it did for me. It took a while for it to update on the site. It was a weekend last time too. I wonder if that has something to do about it?0
-
NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.RaschNuts:
I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weekslaker1963:Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.0 -
No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.laker1963:
NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.RaschNuts:
I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weekslaker1963:Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
0 -
Hanks for the heads up. We changed some formatting and will get this resolved.0
-
DOH !!!bacon.jay:
No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.laker1963:
NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.RaschNuts:
I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weekslaker1963:Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.0 -
*shaking head*laker1963:
DOH !!!bacon.jay:
No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.laker1963:
NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.RaschNuts:
I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weekslaker1963:Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
Must be a Canadian thing
0 -
Shaking head...cabinetmaker:
*shaking head*laker1963:
DOH !!!bacon.jay:
No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.laker1963:
NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.RaschNuts:
I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weekslaker1963:Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
Must be a Canadian thing0 -
Anyone else read the Cigar.com Newsletter - December 18, 2011 yet. Cigar.com Black Tie Fundraiser at the Sands Casino and Resort in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Fall 2012. Looks like this is going to be a first class event for really good cause.
May have to start laying the ground work with the wife on this one now.0 -
Can't say I've read it yet, but thanks for the heads up, I'll find it nowamz1301:Anyone else read the Cigar.com Newsletter - December 18, 2011 yet. Cigar.com Black Tie Fundraiser at the Sands Casino and Resort in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Fall 2012. Looks like this is going to be a first class event for really good cause.
May have to start laying the ground work with the wife on this one now.
"When walking in open territory bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask them to stop. If they do not stop, destroy them."0 -
I need to find out about the dinner. I would love to go if it is in the budget.0
-
Pretty good article on box press cigars..0
-
+1 I thought it was too, I don't know why, but I truly enjoy box pressed sticks the most. Not sure why, just do!The Kid:Pretty good article on box press cigars..0
