RP Signature, CT, Vintage 1999 comparison?
asolomon
Posts: 128 ✭
Hey folks,
I'm looking to try a mild-medium and delectably creamy Connecticut from RP, and since I'm low on cash I'm only getting one for now. Between the Signture, CT, and Vintage 1999, which do y'all think are the best and most match that description, and what are some of the differences between the three? I'll admit that I really want to try the RP Signature Series because it looks soooooooooo damn beautiful!
0
Comments
The normal ct is nutty and creamy. Very Mild bodied. This is a good stick to hand out to newer cigar smokers.
The 1999 is also nutty and creamy, but has some woody flavors, and it's a bit more complex. I like the aroma a lot. Very good smoke. Mild bodied.
The Signature has a distinct cashew flavor to the nuttiness. It's creamy, and has some sweetness to it. It's got more body than the other two and is one of my favorite Connecticut wrapped cigars. Great stick.
A close second, very close, is the Perdomo ESV '91. It's similar in body, closer to medium, and very nutty. A slow burner too. Don't buy the Churchills unless you've got a lot of time. Another one I like is also by Perdomo, the 10th Anniversary Champagne. The one with the Yellow cello. It's much more mild that the first two, and it's more creamy than nutty, but still very good. Both the Perdomos have top notch construction.
"Long ashes my friends."