Home Non Cigar Related

Canadian Conservatives sweep Parliament

xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
Just when you think Canada is sliding backwards into a french-like socialist state, they surprise you and pull out something great, like the 2006 election up there, which looks set to continue with their biggest sweep yet. Now if we can only get that kinda wave for 2012 going down here . . .

Canadian Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper's landslide victory in Monday's election, capturing the first center-right majority since 1988.

Mr. Harper has been running a minority government since 2006 and this time he won big. Conservatives captured 167 seats of 308. Second place went to the hard-left New Democratic Party, which won 102 seats and is now the official opposition, replacing the more moderate center-left Liberal Party. Liberals won a scant 34 seats, while the separatist party, Bloc Quebecois, took the worst drubbing, winning only four seats against 47 in the last parliament.

Mr. Harper was conciliatory on Monday night but also took appropriate credit. "We got that mandate because of the way we have governed, because of our record," he said in Calgary.

Comments

  • laker1963laker1963 Posts: 5,046
    xmacro:
    Just when you think Canada is sliding backwards into a french-like socialist state, they surprise you and pull out something great, like the 2006 election up there, which looks set to continue with their biggest sweep yet. Now if we can only get that kinda wave for 2012 going down here . . .

    Canadian Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper's landslide victory in Monday's election, capturing the first center-right majority since 1988.

    Mr. Harper has been running a minority government since 2006 and this time he won big. Conservatives captured 167 seats of 308. Second place went to the hard-left New Democratic Party, which won 102 seats and is now the official opposition, replacing the more moderate center-left Liberal Party. Liberals won a scant 34 seats, while the separatist party, Bloc Quebecois, took the worst drubbing, winning only four seats against 47 in the last parliament.

    Mr. Harper was conciliatory on Monday night but also took appropriate credit. "We got that mandate because of the way we have governed, because of our record," he said in Calgary.

    Well I am glad you are happy for us . As for your comments about Canada sliding backwards towards a social state. You don't know what the *** you are talking about so shut the *** up.
    I know let me guess you weren't trying to offend anybody with that comment. I should just grow a thicker skin perhaps? Well you know how thinned skinned the French can be. For a group of people who get very offended when others talk about them in a derogatory manner, I would have thought an American would be a little more more gracious.
    Of course I know macro was just trying to push some buttons, and that is what pisses me off so much about this. Has this place become a place to name call and make fun of people now? Too bad, used to be a KEWL place with KEWL people to hang out with. Now it seems some folk come here to get their rocks off by starting up *** like this. Too bad.
    This wouldn't bother me at all, except that I know like most American, you know or care very little about our system, and this post was written only to piss people off and stir up ***. Well done macro, hope it made your day. Later guy's.
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    Take it how you want.

    While I don't follow the Canadian system as closely as I do the US, I follow it about as closely as South American elections, European elections, African elections, SE Asian elections, etc - which is to say, I keep abreast of which party's are in power, what their platforms are, and what the opposition political party platform's are.

    Canada is America's largest trading partner, and deeply integrated with the US economy. From my POV, it's good to have Harper sweep up; much better than having the NDP in power
  • laker1963laker1963 Posts: 5,046
    xmacro:
    Take it how you want.

    While I don't follow the Canadian system as closely as I do the US, I follow it about as closely as South American elections, European elections, African elections, SE Asian elections, etc - which is to say, I keep abreast of which party's are in power, what their platforms are, and what the opposition political party platform's are.

    Canada is America's largest trading partner, and deeply integrated with the US economy. From my POV, it's good to have Harper sweep up; much better than having the NDP in power
    I don't agree or disagree with you on who won, and I never did. I am pissed because you and a few others around here seem to like to push buttons to get *** started. This used to be a place for cigar talk, good stories, family stuff, but has become nothing more then a soap box for any kind of political discourse that people want to engage in.
    Tell you what macro, why don't you fill me in on some of the platforms of the various parties here in Canada, since you do follow Canadian politics as much as you do any other third world nation? You can PM me so we don't fill the boards with more of this ***.
    It seems like saying I don't want to get drawn into these things isn't good enough. Now people are going to be baiting these types of conversations. Sure I could stay out of it, but I hold strong feelings about some things and I don't like it when people who don't know talk as if they did. This board just isn't fun anymore, the good feelings have turned sour and nasty at times even, in some cases. Politics will do that to people, and that is why I wanted out of these discussions so long ago. I came here to make friends and talk cigars. I can argue with anyone I want at almost anytime if I want to talk politics. Starting to feel like if you don't belong to the correct political party... you are no longer part of the club, which is a cigar place, not a political forum. Having people decide who I am and what I stand for based on what THEY percieve my political beliefs are, is getting real old. Must be similar to what it feels like to be considered a criminal of some kind if you are black, or you must be a gang banger if you are Spanish, or black, or poor. Label, labels, labels.
    I am sorry that my feelings of empathy for others bothers you so much. The fact that I would like to see society take care of society like a big extended family instead of being in some kind of phony contest with everyone around me, feeling like if they get something, then that is one less thing that I can get for myself. I am self emplyed and have been for over 20 years. I don't qualify for most government subsidies, and I don't look for them. I also don't begrudge them to those in our society that needs help. Yes that does lead to there being a certain % of people who take advantage of the generousity of that system. However, if the choice is between having a small % of people take advantage of the system, or cutting off everyone including those people who need help in order to make sure there is nobody taking advantage of the system, then I will go for keeping the system as is, rather then not help those who need it.
    Now remember when you start to think of me as some kind of communist. socialist or any other dirty little label you can think of... I am self employed and take absolutely NO subsidies or hand outs from the government. I also don't feel like I am being shorted because some of my money is going to help these people. I try to maintain a "whole view approach" to the world. I don't always look at things only in the way they can benefit me personally. I recognize that I am NOT the center of the universe and I try to bring that into my every day life.
  • stephen_hannibalstephen_hannibal Posts: 4,317
    Photobucket
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    ^ Considering how bad that guy's acting was in Ep. II and III, I wouldn't trust anything he says

    On-topic: Not getting into this with you Laker. You've got your opinions and I've got mine; no sense in expanding this argument beyond the elections and the issues around it. Canadians comment on US elections, and Americans comment on Canadian elections - take it at face value for what it is, a commentary on a recent election and my opinion of Canada's social-safety net. You like a big net, I see a net as necessary like you, but believe it can be smaller than what you envision - that's the sum of our differences.
  • sightunseensightunseen Posts: 2,130 ✭✭
    Surely you can respect an actor of Ian McKellen's caliber.

    image
  • clearlysuspectclearlysuspect Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭✭
    I don't see anything wrong with this post. I should keep up with what happens in Canada but I don't so thanks for educating me a little on current events.

    Laker, I'm not trying to gang up on you but if you want to talk cigars, family, and stories their are other threads and other forums. This is the Non-Cigar Related forum for "Jokes, Sports, Politics, and the like." If you didn't want in a political conversation, why did you open a political thread?
  • VulchorVulchor Posts: 4,848 ✭✭✭✭
    I think a sweep happened already here....a sweeping in or new bums to replace the old bums, while neither really gives a $hit about any of us. The only thing getting swept away in Canada or the US from what I see these days is common sense and rational thought---and this goes for every side of the aisle so please dont call me a liberal or other assumed derogatory name again which does not fit my poitical or social ideology. Thank You All, and Good Night;)
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    sightunseen:
    Surely you can respect an actor of Ian McKellen's caliber.

    image
    This guy I can trust
  • phobicsquirrelphobicsquirrel Posts: 7,347 ✭✭✭
    I feel more like a democratic socialist. I personally would like to see a grand chancellor who has rule over all of the world with corporations making the rules and we all kill each other for food and shelter. Sort of a cross between V for Vendetta, Equilibrium, and Mad Max.
  • PuroFreakPuroFreak Posts: 4,131 ✭✭
    Vulchor:
    I think a sweep happened already here....a sweeping in or new bums to replace the old bums, while neither really gives a $hit about any of us. The only thing getting swept away in Canada or the US from what I see these days is common sense and rational thought---and this goes for every side of the aisle so please dont call me a liberal or other assumed derogatory name again which does not fit my poitical or social ideology. Thank You All, and Good Night;)
    What ever you commie! LoL First name Vulchor last name Stalin? Or is it Marxx? ;) Just messing with ya man. Couldn't resist a light hearted jab with all the pissing and moaning going on. (not by you)
  • stephen_hannibalstephen_hannibal Posts: 4,317
    phobicsquirrel:
    I feel more like a democratic socialist. I personally would like to see a grand chancellor who has rule over all of the world with corporations making the rules and we all kill each other for food and shelter. Sort of a cross between V for Vendetta, Equilibrium, and Mad Max.
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA OMG.

  • MTuccelliMTuccelli Posts: 2,629 ✭✭✭
    phobicsquirrel:
    I feel more like a democratic socialist. I personally would like to see a grand chancellor who has rule over all of the world with corporations making the rules and we all kill each other for food and shelter. Sort of a cross between V for Vendetta, Equilibrium, and Mad Max.
    Mad Max was an A$$ kicking movie. I wouldn't mind the world ending up like that as long as I had that car!
  • laker1963laker1963 Posts: 5,046
    clearlysuspect:
    I don't see anything wrong with this post. I should keep up with what happens in Canada but I don't so thanks for educating me a little on current events.

    Laker, I'm not trying to gang up on you but if you want to talk cigars, family, and stories their are other threads and other forums. This is the Non-Cigar Related forum for "Jokes, Sports, Politics, and the like." If you didn't want in a political conversation, why did you open a political thread?
    Maybe you should re-read his post then. What I was commenting on most was this comment...Just when you think Canada is sliding backwards into a french-like socialist state, they surprise you...
    That is a very erogant, offensive statement. I didn't know you guy's considered Canada a socialist French like state. With the comments made following these comments, that is the only conclusion a person can come to. I waited for quite a while to see if anyone would key on that statement but nobody did. Instead I got told there was nothing wrong with what was said. I can only then assume that you guy's agree with the statement.
    Commenting on our politics in no big deal, making statements about our leaders, again fair game, they entered a public life. Making statements about Canadians in a personal manner as was done here is over the line.
    I have in the past made comments on American politics and political leaders. I have NEVER made disparaging statements about Americans as a people. That would be very low class, and I would expect to be jumped on. But I guess if it is one of you guy's and your making these kinds of statements about people other then Americans ... it's all good.
    Oh and one more thing here clearly... I didn't start this thread. Where did you get that idea? I responded to the thread.
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    I was commenting on your Gov't, their policies, and what I view as bloated social spending. Where you got the idea I was insulting the Canadian people is beyond me
  • laker1963laker1963 Posts: 5,046
    xmacro:
    I was commenting on your Gov't, their policies, and what I view as bloated social spending. Where you got the idea I was insulting the Canadian people is beyond me
    See my comments in Oz's thread about the changes here at the forums. I think that may cover it macro.
    The policies of a government always reflect on the population, since it is the population which elects the government. That is why there are so many folks in the US who are freaked by Obama, because he doesn't represent their personal views but he is the spookeman for those views on the world stage. Same goes here.
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    Sooo . . . by your definition, insulting a country's Gov't or their policies is insulting it's people? That's total BS - if that's the way you view things, then by that definition, there's no way I can ever criticize any Gov't policies without insulting the people of that country.

    Insulting an elected Gov't isn't the same as insulting the people, and I can criticize bone-headed policies and bloated social spending all I please without saying anything derogatory about the population. I'm glad the Liberal party are out of power, that the NDP isn't in the majority, and that Harper's conservatives swept up - the majority of Canadian's would agree with me as well.

    Why you're taking a criticism of your Gov't policies and the parties out of power so personally is something I just don't understand. You can insult Obama or the Republicans all you want - just because you don't view one or either of them highly doesn't translate to you not liking Americans - I don't know why you'd view it any differently with me commenting on the Canadian Gov't

  • phobicsquirrelphobicsquirrel Posts: 7,347 ✭✭✭
    laker1963:
    xmacro:
    I was commenting on your Gov't, their policies, and what I view as bloated social spending. Where you got the idea I was insulting the Canadian people is beyond me
    See my comments in Oz's thread about the changes here at the forums. I think that may cover it macro.
    The policies of a government always reflect on the population, since it is the population which elects the government. That is why there are so many folks in the US who are freaked by Obama, because he doesn't represent their personal views but he is the spookeman for those views on the world stage. Same goes here.
    yup govt operates on the premise that the electorate is informed. Not sure how yours works exactly Doug, but here in the US people, whether they are just retarded or are so blind to the ads being pushed as well as the lame media and their weak questions on candidates have really dropped the ball in the last several decades, especially in the last decade. I mean people in Florida actually elected a lobbyist. I really think that in order to vote, one needs to take a standard IQ test and needs to meet a certain number. That would really help, however it would never be implemented.
  • laker1963laker1963 Posts: 5,046
    xmacro:
    Sooo . . . by your definition, insulting a country's Gov't or their policies is insulting it's people? That's total BS - if that's the way you view things, then by that definition, there's no way I can ever criticize any Gov't policies without insulting the people of that country.

    Insulting an elected Gov't isn't the same as insulting the people, and I can criticize bone-headed policies and bloated social spending all I please without saying anything derogatory about the population. I'm glad the Liberal party are out of power, that the NDP isn't in the majority, and that Harper's conservatives swept up - the majority of Canadian's would agree with me as well.

    Why you're taking a criticism of your Gov't policies and the parties out of power so personally is something I just don't understand. You can insult Obama or the Republicans all you want - just because you don't view one or either of them highly doesn't translate to you not liking Americans - I don't know why you'd view it any differently with me commenting on the Canadian Gov't

    Yeah, I can see where being referred to as backwards was a comment on our government. This goes to what I said about the way we say things and the way they may be taken. Your statement is a general comment on all canadians because you didn't say it was only about the government.
    As for your comment on Harper and his "sweep" of the majority of Canadians... your off base there as well. Harper won a majority of the seats in Parliament. He did NOT win a majority of Canadian votes. First there was only slightly over 60% of the people who voted. Of that 60% Harpers managed to get not quite 40% of the vote. With our parliamentary system that still enntitles him to a majority government because of the distribution of votes and the number of seats his party won.
    When you keep your comments to politicians or public figures that's one thing. You made a general statement about Canadians surprising you because we changed our backwards ways. That's too personal.
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    laker1963:
    Yeah, I can see where being referred to as backwards was a comment on our government. This goes to what I said about the way we say things and the way they may be taken. Your statement is a general comment on all canadians because you didn't say it was only about the government.
    As for your comment on Harper and his "sweep" of the majority of Canadians... your off base there as well. Harper won a majority of the seats in Parliament. He did NOT win a majority of Canadian votes. First there was only slightly over 60% of the people who voted. Of that 60% Harpers managed to get not quite 40% of the vote. With our parliamentary system that still enntitles him to a majority government because of the distribution of votes and the number of seats his party won.
    When you keep your comments to politicians or public figures that's one thing. You made a general statement about Canadians surprising you because we changed our backwards ways. That's too personal.
    Laker, I'm done with this topic - you think that just because I didn't put a disclaimer on my post, ***this post is about the Gov't policies, not the canadians***, that I'm by extension insulting you? Get a life.

    If you wanna take everything I say as an insult, be my guest. If you can't see things any other way than an insult, there's no point left in talking. Take my comments however you like and you can be as offended or as un-offended as you please.


    On-topic: A win's a win, and I'm glad that Harper swept the Parliamentary elections and doesn't have to cobble anything together with other parties - I'm looking forward to seeing what he can do with a majority. I'm still glad he's gonna reverse course away from the french-like socialist state and start cutting the bloated budgets.

    Here's to 5 more years of Harper, and I wish our Gov't would start reversing our backward slide and find some fiscal sanity come 2012.

  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    phobicsquirrel:
    yup govt operates on the premise that the electorate is informed. Not sure how yours works exactly Doug, but here in the US people, whether they are just retarded or are so blind to the ads being pushed as well as the lame media and their weak questions on candidates have really dropped the ball in the last several decades, especially in the last decade. I mean people in Florida actually elected a lobbyist. I really think that in order to vote, one needs to take a standard IQ test and needs to meet a certain number. That would really help, however it would never be implemented.
    Now this is an example of insulting the voters instead of the Gov't policies, though I doubt Laker will be offended quite as much by Pheebs' post.

    Pheebs - Considering that your state isn't doing so hot with unemployment or budgets, as well as the fact that the only solution your pols can come up with is to raise taxes, I wouldn't be talking too much about the "retarded or blind voters".
  • phobicsquirrelphobicsquirrel Posts: 7,347 ✭✭✭
    xmacro:
    phobicsquirrel:
    yup govt operates on the premise that the electorate is informed. Not sure how yours works exactly Doug, but here in the US people, whether they are just retarded or are so blind to the ads being pushed as well as the lame media and their weak questions on candidates have really dropped the ball in the last several decades, especially in the last decade. I mean people in Florida actually elected a lobbyist. I really think that in order to vote, one needs to take a standard IQ test and needs to meet a certain number. That would really help, however it would never be implemented.
    Now this is an example of insulting the voters instead of the Gov't policies, though I doubt Laker will be offended quite as much by Pheebs' post.

    Pheebs - Considering that your state isn't doing so hot with unemployment or budgets, as well as the fact that the only solution your pols can come up with is to raise taxes, I wouldn't be talking too much about the "retarded or blind voters".
    Lol, well our state is doing better than most. Besides don't get your panties in a bunch over the fact that your state voted for some really upstanding candidates. Whether or not you agree with universal healthcare, a system that has unemployment, state/federal fire/police, a food and drug admin, environmental oversight, and other stat/federal programs, you, us and we as a people would be in a world of hurt if all of these programs weren't around. Our health care system here is horrible, ever see the movie SickO? I know you are all for profit healthcare but not everything is suppose to be for profit. It comes down to moving up in evolution, to evolve into a more caring society where people are equal. Sure some people will always have more than others but it comes down to a basic social structure that is for the betterment of mankind. Your way of thinking as with your party and sure even the democratic party is in the past.

    Corporations are in the business to make money and when that is hurting "people" and killing them it's time to move on. Govt. as we know it today is set up to provide protection for the commons, the people. Going back to the founding of this country that was the main reason for creating this united states, is for freedom from oppression. Sure blacks were treated horribly, women were too, and there was many problems but it was better than what other countries offered. Now we are one of the worst countries to live in. France is a much better country to live in.

    And the intelligence of the people of this country is dwindling. I mean people care more about who's winning American Idol, or who Kim Kardassian screwed last night than say what is going on in this country. I mean you have a group that is funded and ran by corporations that are paying for publicity and using people to push their causes, and these people will be effected by their agenda and not in a good way. You have networks that are purposely misleading people from the facts and are getting away with it. The money controls our govt and in return we are getting further away from what our country was founded on, freedom from oppression. Everyday workers are becoming more and more consumed by low wages, longer hours or more work load. Or people who once had good jobs are either out of work or standing in line for hours for a job at burger king.
    Meanwhile corporations are sitting on trillions of dollars and in the meantime this country is not producing. Companies make money when people buy things, and in fact that isn't happening here anymore, I mean millions of people are out of work and even off unemployment. GE's CEO even said that their consumers are no longer in this country, they are in Asia and India, where guess what, so many US jobs have went. These corporations have turned our country into a 3rd world country. Govt has failed to reign in these corporations and thus we are where we are.
  • xmacroxmacro Posts: 3,402
    EDIT - As much as I'd love to get into this with you Pheebs, I'd rather stay on-topic for this one. The only thing I agree with you about is that people spend too much time obsessing over crap tv instead of reading a newspaper - everything else I vehemently disagree with. Some other time I'll get into it with you.
  • laker1963laker1963 Posts: 5,046
    xmacro:
    phobicsquirrel:
    yup govt operates on the premise that the electorate is informed. Not sure how yours works exactly Doug, but here in the US people, whether they are just retarded or are so blind to the ads being pushed as well as the lame media and their weak questions on candidates have really dropped the ball in the last several decades, especially in the last decade. I mean people in Florida actually elected a lobbyist. I really think that in order to vote, one needs to take a standard IQ test and needs to meet a certain number. That would really help, however it would never be implemented.
    Now this is an example of insulting the voters instead of the Gov't policies, though I doubt Laker will be offended quite as much by Pheebs' post.

    Pheebs - Considering that your state isn't doing so hot with unemployment or budgets, as well as the fact that the only solution your pols can come up with is to raise taxes, I wouldn't be talking too much about the "retarded or blind voters".
    Ummm, why would I be offended? He made a comment about people in his own country. Not my place to be offended. I can understand that you would be offended by it, but I don't see the correlation you were trying to draw. Anyway, I'm glad your glad about our politics up here, until that one comment which started all this I don't believe you have ever commented on things here.
    As for me I think you get the politics you deserve, not always the politics you desire.
Sign In or Register to comment.