I would much rather we take care of our own problems first. Then we should concentrate on the sick and hungry elsewhere and leave the rest to killing each other off.
I wasn't sure I would ever say this, but I agree with you here.
I would much rather we take care of our own problems first. Then we should concentrate on the sick and hungry elsewhere and leave the rest to killing each other off.
I wasn't sure I would ever say this, but I agree with you here.
+1 exactly.
If people and politician's believe socialism works talk to anyone from Venezuela. Abject train wreck.
The next President will spend two years trying to fix everything Obama did to healthcare system. Then the next year plugging the holes in the southern boarder. Then maybe they will have time to govern.
Then the next year plugging the holes in the southern boarder. Then maybe they will have time to govern.
Somewhat off topic, but border patrol is reporting that there may be someone or some organization telling people in Central America that US border patrol and INS won't deport you if enter the US illegally with a child. Whether this person/organization is doing this to overwhelm INS and border agents to help the cartels or if this is for some kind of political agenda is unknown.
Though I agree with you I wonder what would happen if we stopped sending our troops, money and technology to the stone age barbarians and countries that stab us in the back every chance they get. I would much rather we take care of our own problems first. Then we should concentrate on the sick and hungry elsewhere and leave the rest to killing each other off.
I agree with some of that, I look at it as wasting our blood and treasure for no real gain. This war seems to have no real objective. In the first Iraq war we should have kept going right through Bagdad, Patton would have. When we went into Iraq the next time Iran started giving up WMD's thinking they were next, and they should have been. Russia was in no position to help them then. Let the military run the wars, go in hard and fast with everything you can and don't let up. Most of these countries have a somewhat viable economy, and if they don't US businesses will soon find their cheap labor. These dictators cozy up to terrorists and will keep killing and starving their own to keep them in power and others in line. Maybe we should also be using our natural resources as a weapon, not to kill but to get some money out of the hands of tyrants and back to us. Our money is paying to fund terrorism really.
Speaking of our technology, and Hillary, article in the NYP
Everyone chill. Jeez you can cut the ad hominem in here with a knife...
LOL,, Yep lots of formal and informal fallacy as well
Bob Luken:
The Kid:
Bob Luken:
Oh, yeah, I kind of agree but, I didn't mean to ask whether she would have been a good president. But, just for the sake of speculation, would she have been better, or worse, than President Obama.
Better or worse for who?????? People with your mindset??? Curious, since this question is based on her statement regarding the Bergdahl trade, Why are you opposed to it? (the trade)
"Better or worse for who?????? People with your mindset???"
What mindset? I don't know your mindset. Why would you presume to know mine?
People with my mindset huh? LOL I'm still chuckling over that one. It's almost as if you said "you people". THAT would have been very funny.
I never stated I knew your mindset, I never stated anything, I asked two simple questions. Didn't get an answer to either one, I withdraw the questions.
Everyone chill. Jeez you can cut the ad hominem in here with a knife...
LOL,, Yep lots of formal and informal fallacy as well
Bob Luken:
The Kid:
Bob Luken:
Oh, yeah, I kind of agree but, I didn't mean to ask whether she would have been a good president. But, just for the sake of speculation, would she have been better, or worse, than President Obama.
Better or worse for who?????? People with your mindset??? Curious, since this question is based on her statement regarding the Bergdahl trade, Why are you opposed to it? (the trade)
"Better or worse for who?????? People with your mindset???"
What mindset? I don't know your mindset. Why would you presume to know mine?
People with my mindset huh? LOL I'm still chuckling over that one. It's almost as if you said "you people". THAT would have been very funny.
I never stated I knew your mindset, I never stated anything, I asked two simple questions. Didn't get an answer to either one, I withdraw the questions.
Sorry 3 questions,, I cant count,,lol
If a Clinton should come back, being ole slick Willy back for a third term. At least he knew what he was doing.
Comments
I agree with some of that, I look at it as wasting our blood and treasure for no real gain. This war seems to have no real objective. In the first Iraq war we should have kept going right through Bagdad, Patton would have. When we went into Iraq the next time Iran started giving up WMD's thinking they were next, and they should have been. Russia was in no position to help them then. Let the military run the wars, go in hard and fast with everything you can and don't let up. Most of these countries have a somewhat viable economy, and if they don't US businesses will soon find their cheap labor. These dictators cozy up to terrorists and will keep killing and starving their own to keep them in power and others in line. Maybe we should also be using our natural resources as a weapon, not to kill but to get some money out of the hands of tyrants and back to us. Our money is paying to fund terrorism really.
Speaking of our technology, and Hillary, article in the NYP
At this point what difference does it make where they came from
I never stated I knew your mindset, I never stated anything, I asked two simple questions. Didn't get an answer to either one, I withdraw the questions.
Sorry 3 questions,, I cant count,,lol