When Cubans are legal in the U.S., what about all the duplicate names?
Bob_Luken
Posts: 10,708 ✭✭✭✭✭
I've heard of one lawsuit (Cohiba) relating to Cuban cigar companies suing non-Cuban cigar makers who use the same names but, aren't there LOTS of examples of this same-name situation going on?
I don't know much about Cuban cigars and I don't keep up with a lot of industry news so, pardon me if I seen uninformed on this issue. I am.
What about all the many examples like Montecristo? Established in Pre-revolution Cuba. The owners fled Cuba and re-established "their" brand in the Dominican Republic. Will there be a fight over those names? Has there already been?
I don't know much about Cuban cigars and I don't keep up with a lot of industry news so, pardon me if I seen uninformed on this issue. I am.
What about all the many examples like Montecristo? Established in Pre-revolution Cuba. The owners fled Cuba and re-established "their" brand in the Dominican Republic. Will there be a fight over those names? Has there already been?
0
Comments
Also, Altadis who owns a large share in habanos s.a. also owns the non-cuban Montecristo, romeo y julieta, trinidad, uppman and maybe a couple more. I doubt there will be much of an issue with these... or altadis would kind of be suing itself.
Maybe I am the only one interested, lol!. Here is a little summary of the Cohiba case. Cohiba is a little different than the pre-revolution brands since it was created afterwards. If any brand belongs to Cuba, it's Cohiba. The others, as you mentioned, are tricky.
Cohiba is a fight over who filed when and who actually has a right to the name.-- the other brands clearly were born in Cuba, the brand creators or families left and re-established the name elsewhere. So there's no question over who was first, I suppose, but who has legal right in the event of a government takeover.
While an interesting question, maybe it is still moot since the same company owns stakes in both brands.
-- Winston Churchill
"LET'S GO FRANCIS" Peter
Here:
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/as-the-cuban-embargo-fizzles-the-battle-for-the-cigar-industry-smolders-6518765
@danielzreyes can most likely elaborate as he is the resident Davidoff ninja
-Jay
-Jay
1. First wave will be millions of "beach vendor" counterfeit Cubans that will bypass U.S. distributors and be sold in bodegas, Miami tourist shops, and on Craiglist and other shadowy online sites. These will be bought by punters who know nothing about cigars and want to boast about being the first to have "real Cubans." These fakes will capture the Phlllies/Swisher Sweet low end of the market.
2. Second wave will be genuine Cubans but of lower-quality brands that can be produced in bulk to meet enormous pent up demand in the U.S. These will be distributed by less-scrupulous distributors and sold in the kinds of retailers that call themselves "smoke shops" but keep their cigars in a small case next to the lottery ticket kiosk. This will cater to the low end of the market as well.
3. Once the overall "fad factor" for Cubans has died down, and many punters get swindled by the fakes and lower-end garbage, sales of this cubotrash will gradually taper off.
4. At the same time, the quality Cubans will enter the market and be distributed mainly by the reputable distributors and sold by the trustworthy B&M and online merchants. Since demand will be high, prices for the most well known and respected brands will be extremely high as the Cuban manufacturers struggle to increase output. The entrance of these quality Cubans into the U.S. market will force many non-Cuban manufacturers to lower the prices of their higher-end cigars,since many of these aficianados will give up the Opus Xes an Padrons for the higher end Cubans.
5. This increased competition will end certain brands--particular those that advertise themselves as "Cuban-seed" or "Cubanesque" and require manufacturers to improve the quality of their best products and shed brands that aren't selling. Numerous manufacturers were merge. I wouldn't be surprised to see Padron and Pepin merge, or to see Case Fuente buy up smaller Nicaraguans businesses to expand their tobacco sources.
6. After about two years or so, and buying Cubans becomes commonplace and many "cigar hipsters" go back to caffe lattes, the market will shake out and Cuban cigars won't necessarily dominate the market but compete on equal terms with Nicaraguan and Dominican companies.
I am with you on the fad-based bubble in demand. I wonder if Cuba swill set retail price agreements to maintain competitive prices (and sell out) or let price markup rise as the supply is exhausted. It will probaly be hard to buy a Cuban here at first.... but I can't say that's different than now! Lol.
I think they will be able to handle the demand better than some believe. Certainly, they see this coming.
I definitely don't think Cuban competition will push out any of the premium Nicaraguan or Dominican brands. Way too different of styles, they really aren't substitutes. Especially opus x and padron; high end Cubans cost just as much, even more already.
There may be an interesting battle of companies who predominantly make more mild cigars. Do you want a $6 Avo or a $6 Cuban RyJ or Ramon Allones? Then again, none of the big guys have only mild offerings (Davidoff maybe? And Avo or the griffin lines).
I guess overall, I see the same movements in the market, but I don't see any many radical changes. I think the Cubans are overestimating how competitive they are. Non-Cubans have started selling more worldwide and other countries have had a long time to grab the market here, not to mention tastes and rg trends. If the market favored milder cigars, I would have a different opinion, but I think Cubans won't suit as many people.
"Wow, who thought these Cohibas would taste exactly like Garcia and Vega?"