Are all Gurkhas created equal (or bad)?
MikeTodd
Posts: 974 ✭✭✭✭✭
So I smoked a Gurkha Beast tonight that I received in a bomb. I really ENJOYED IT! Nice smoke output, good flavors that changed some through the smoke that kept it interesting and it lasted me 2 hours.
So my question is, are all Gurkhas created equal or are some better then others? I am a newbie so maybe my palate is just not refined yet?
I see a lot of Gurkha hate and so far my one interaction has been good.
So my question is, are all Gurkhas created equal or are some better then others? I am a newbie so maybe my palate is just not refined yet?
I see a lot of Gurkha hate and so far my one interaction has been good.
0
Comments
My experience with RP is pretty much the same. That is why I refuse to buy a sampler that involves Gurkha, RP or Sancho Panza (a true yard gar, thrown in the yard shortly after lighting).
"If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed. If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." -- Mark Twain
Are Diesel's better than Gurkhas?
I admit, I have only had one diesel and it tasted like a really strong, really tarry pine branch. I got half way and had to pitch it.
Subsequently I have been re-bombing the diesels to other people whenever I get them in trades, etc.
Am I making a grave mistake?
I like AJ's other blends -- but the unholy cocktail I smoked last summer was not enjoyable. In all honesty, most likely due to my then-4-month-old palate.
Do I need to revisit Diesel, and revise them from my estimation of placing them roughly equivalent to Gurkha?
-Jay
This is all personal taste. I will never discount an entire brand based on one cigar. I try them all and the ones I do not like I don't bother with, but to me having one bad cigar and saying they all must be like this is unfair.
MOW badge received.
It hasn't been a 'fvck diesel and the horse they rode in on', but more along the lines of it created a massive hesitation on my part any time I picked one up. Call it a Pavlovian response.
Mr Brickey, your post has made me realize I need to go back and try some other lines in the brands that I thought were mediocre. Because dammit, tastes change, or can be affected by what I ate or my mood, or any number of variables.
I will say this though: I've never heard almost unanimous complaints about their construction issues like I have about gurkha. Diesel also does not claim to be the Rolls Royce of cigars.
No they don't but everytime a new AJ blend comes out the catalog says something about it being the most cubanesc that he has come out with. Look through old catalogs. You'll see what I'm talking about. I'm also not a huge AJ fan, so I have to let that be know. I did like the Diesel with serious age. I liked the Diesel unlimited immediately! I liked the pinolero a lot and I really like the skull crusher and little devil. The rest to me just don't do it for me. Same thing with Tatuaje and DPG. Their tastes are just not my tastes. But isn't that what it comes down to? Personal Taste?
-Jay
I rarely read the catalog for the sales pitch. Their job is to make the sh**tiest cigar sound like something you need to have. I just look at the wrapper, binder and filler info.
I like the Rogue rascal. It's not terrible and usually doesn't have too many issues other than burning funny sometimes. And the price is reflective of it. Pretty reasonable.
As for Diesels, I like the Hair of the dog, but the wicked is a little harsh to me.
It's hard to say that a cigar is bad as a whole.
Just like some folks like stuff like the Puros Indios and I can't bring myself to like them very much.
I never give up on a brand/line by smoking just one cigar.
But then again, if you get a great cigar, don't fall in love with it too much until you've had a few of them.
Cause you may smoke one that is great and grab another and think, "What the hell happened to this one?"
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy cigars and that's close enough.