AJ Fenandez - Pinolero
beatnic
Posts: 4,133 ✭
Comments
-
if there anything like the oval i'll be happy0
-
It's supposed to be a Cuban style blend so I'd hope it will be quite different honestly. I am hoping it is a departure from his typical blends.The buffalonian:if there anything like the oval i'll be happy0 -
Me too!!!catfishbluezz:
It's supposed to be a Cuban style blend so I'd hope it will be quite different honestly. I am hoping it is a departure from his typical blends.The buffalonian:if there anything like the oval i'll be happy0 -
Very interesting, can't wait to smoke a few.0
-
+1catfishbluezz:
It's supposed to be a Cuban style blend so I'd hope it will be quite different honestly. I am hoping it is a departure from his typical blends.The buffalonian:if there anything like the oval i'll be happy0 -
http://www.cigar-coop.com/2012/05/cigar-pre-review-pinolero-by-aj.html
This is a decent pre-review of the Pinolero. All the buzz I'm hearing about this cigar is that it really is "Cubanesque".0 -
it may be good but is it Cubanesque?JDH:http://www.cigar-coop.com/2012/05/cigar-pre-review-pinolero-by-aj.html
This is a decent pre-review of the Pinolero. All the buzz I'm hearing about this cigar is that it really is "Cubanesque".
ill believe it when i smoke it.
0 -
I am looking forward to this, I enjoy most of AJ's stuff that I have had, and the Ovals in particular. As far as 'Cubanesque'...I really wouldn't care if it was 'Canadianesque' as long as it is delicious.0
-
+1jthanatos:I am looking forward to this, I enjoy most of AJ's stuff that I have had, and the Ovals in particular. As far as 'Cubanesque'...I really wouldn't care if it was 'Canadianesque' as long as it is delicious.0 -
One of the reviews I read spoke of it picking up significantly at the end. I hope this means it is not the typical AJ earth. I know he blends for the European market, so I'd hope it is geared towards that palate. The last conny AJ I had, I tossed.kuzi16:
it may be good but is it Cubanesque?JDH:http://www.cigar-coop.com/2012/05/cigar-pre-review-pinolero-by-aj.html
This is a decent pre-review of the Pinolero. All the buzz I'm hearing about this cigar is that it really is "Cubanesque".
ill believe it when i smoke it.0 -
Looks like this hit the Internet today... Funny, it says his most full bodie creation yet... Doesn't sound cubanesque to me...I'll pass for now0
-
I also heard from Andy it was b&m only.... Maybe pre sales were soft0
-
+1 lmaoSmokindaddy:
Me too!!!catfishbluezz:
It's supposed to be a Cuban style blend so I'd hope it will be quite different honestly. I am hoping it is a departure from his typical blends.The buffalonian:if there anything like the oval i'll be happyMoney can't buy taste0 -
well i smoked one, finally.kuzi16:
it may be good but is it Cubanesque?JDH:http://www.cigar-coop.com/2012/05/cigar-pre-review-pinolero-by-aj.html
This is a decent pre-review of the Pinolero. All the buzz I'm hearing about this cigar is that it really is "Cubanesque".
ill believe it when i smoke it.
i jotted down some quick notes as i smoked it:
I can see why Alex said that it could be confused with a Cuban cigar. With age I feel that this will become even more true. The Nicaraguan spice should tone down the sharp earth flavors that I associate with Cuban cigars could be more dominant. if it keeps the balance and the vegetable-like sweetness with age then we will be in for a real treat. The burn was perfect even when I accidentally cracked the wrapper. I am going to put a few of these down for a while and hope for the best. I do have high hopes. Thank you wwhwang for hooking me up with these as my secret santa.0 -
The sharp earth upfront turned me off. It dd remind me of Por Llanga a bit or a young ISOM with the profile, but the finish was not as good. I will also grab a fiver sometime and out them down a couple years. I was very surprised when I smoked it during the second third.0
-
I smoked one of these two days ago. I truly enjoyed it. I have to smoke a few more but I think this cigar will be up on my favorite list soon.0
-
0 -
I haven't tried a Pinolero yet, but I know what you mean about the PL. But with the PL that sharpness is also balanced quite a bit by the very strong cedar tones. I think without them, I would not care for the PL. But as they are, I do enjoy the sharpness in their profile.catfishbluezz:The sharp earth upfront turned me off. It dd remind me of Por Llanga a bit or a young ISOM with the profile, but the finish was not as good. I will also grab a fiver sometime and out them down a couple years. I was very surprised when I smoked it during the second third.0 -
you will probably dig this then bro. Some ISOM tend to have that, PL just has it more IMO.BigT06:
I haven't tried a Pinolero yet, but I know what you mean about the PL. But with the PL that sharpness is also balanced quite a bit by the very strong cedar tones. I think without them, I would not care for the PL. But as they are, I do enjoy the sharpness in their profile.catfishbluezz:The sharp earth upfront turned me off. It dd remind me of Por Llanga a bit or a young ISOM with the profile, but the finish was not as good. I will also grab a fiver sometime and out them down a couple years. I was very surprised when I smoked it during the second third.0 -
The PL def has the most of any CC that comes to mind.catfishbluezz:
you will probably dig this then bro. Some ISOM tend to have that, PL just has it more IMO.BigT06:
I haven't tried a Pinolero yet, but I know what you mean about the PL. But with the PL that sharpness is also balanced quite a bit by the very strong cedar tones. I think without them, I would not care for the PL. But as they are, I do enjoy the sharpness in their profile.catfishbluezz:The sharp earth upfront turned me off. It dd remind me of Por Llanga a bit or a young ISOM with the profile, but the finish was not as good. I will also grab a fiver sometime and out them down a couple years. I was very surprised when I smoked it during the second third.
I will have to get my hands on a couple Pinoleros then. Been meaning to give it a try anyways, actually.0 -
I thought that the cigar was good, but a little to much spice /burn in the retrohale. They have to be smoked "gently".0
-
Huh for me there was very little spice...I'm use to aj putting something searing out but this was mild to mekaspera79:I thought that the cigar was good, but a little to much spice /burn in the retrohale. They have to be smoked "gently".Money can't buy taste0 -
This is why I love this forum. I trust all of your opinions a whole lot more than what I read elsewhere. And within a couple of posts I got a pretty good idea of what it will (really)taste like. Thanks guys!0
-
This stick tore up my sinuses. I could not retrohale it or I would get no flavor out of it. Every cigar I smoke gets at least 50/50 out my nose. This one I had to pull way back on method. Not a bad cigar once I found the way I needed to smoke it.Lee.mcglynn:
Huh for me there was very little spice...I'm use to aj putting something searing out but this was mild to mekaspera79:I thought that the cigar was good, but a little to much spice /burn in the retrohale. They have to be smoked "gently".0













