Macanudo Hampton Court
I just bought a Macanudo Hampton Court which is a tubed cigar with a cedar wrapping. Should I remove it from the tube and keep the cedar wrap? I also heard a lot of bad reviews, but wanted to try it none the less. I remember smoking one of these before I was "aware" and now interested it going back and trying it with an open mind and palette, not to mention a smaller ring size. Are these as bad as people make them out to be?
0
Comments
Meanwhile, back to the real subject at hand: It is true that it's all a matter of individual taste. However, it is also equally true that it's not all just a matter of individual taste. I myself have only been smoking cigars for just over a year, and have only been trying to develop a palate for half as long. Once I score a stick, I find reviews most helpful if I read them AFTER smoking the cigar. What I find is that one review will say cigar X tastes like pecans, the next will say peanuts, one will say oak, the next will say cedar. But if six out of eight say it's nutty and woody, then it's apt to be some kind of nuts and some kind of wood. In my newbishness, I may have concluded stick X tasted like cashews, but did not identify the wood until after I read about the wood and said "Yeah, that's it!". That helps me spot wood in the next stick. If I have not yet bought a cigar, then I do like to look it up on my smart phone while I am in the B&M's walk-in standing there considering it. If six out of eight say stick X is mediocre, then chances are real good it is mediocre. If reviews were entirely a matter of individual preference, then they wouldn't be useful at all.
What I am trying to say is, makes sense to look at reviews before you buy or after you smoke; not after you buy before you smoke.
Cigars are a great obsession, aren't they?