Nastiest cigar.

2»

Comments

  • jsnake
    jsnake Posts: 5,979 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Krieg:
    jsnake:
    Every Padron cigar I have ever had. Taste like a cat crapped in a cigarette ashtray at Rosie O'Donnel's house which was left in her sweaty underwear drawer. Blah Accckkkkk Thhhhhptttt
    Ouch! LOL! Ever tried the 1926 80th anniv?
    I honestly can't recall which ones I have had. Not sure if I ever smoked the high end fancy ones or not. I may have had a few and given them away due to my initial bad experiences. It seriously is the only brand I have ever just thrown away without trying to finish. I tried a few different ones too. They were just so nasty I had to throw them out. The newest one I haven't tried either.
  • Vulchor
    Vulchor Posts: 4,848 ✭✭✭✭
    Victor Sinclair Bohmeian Bamboo was the worst ever. Nica Libra, Park Ave, and the last forum blend we all put together are pretty far down the **** chain as well.
  • jimmyv723
    jimmyv723 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭
    CI Legends Series Drew Estate. It was like walking into a smoky bar and picking up a piece of butterscotch candy that had been sitting on the bar for a few years in an ashtray. I enjoy some coffee, chocolate and caramel flavors and undertones in cigars but this was just over the top ridiculous.
    Ken Light 3K MOW Badge - 8/14
    2015 Gang War - East Coast
    Enola Gay - Target #29
     
  • Bob_Luken
    Bob_Luken Posts: 11,661 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just goes to show that everyone has different tastes. Several entries on this list are good cigars for me. Also other cigars that made this list I know have plenty of support in general from other BOTLs. Or do some of us just like 'em nasty?
  • Vulchor
    Vulchor Posts: 4,848 ✭✭✭✭
    Lol....I think we like em nasty Bob-----or at least that sounds the best to me lol. I will say that while I ONLY smoke them if I am given one, I have never had a problem with the plethora of flavored Drew Estate sticks.
  • ShadowInTheMoon
    ShadowInTheMoon Posts: 507 ✭✭
    I would not lable it nasty but i dont like them but for me its the 5 vegas gold.
    Two people with a common goal can accomplish many things. Two people with a common enemy can accomplish even more.
  • youngryan216
    youngryan216 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭
    When a cigar is great you never forget it. When a cigar is bad you never forget it. It's the ones in between that take up all your time and money.
    ISO Ramrod and Ron Mexico
  • YankeeMan
    YankeeMan Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As I read through the responses, I'm struck by how many times one person's favorite cigar is some other person's nasty one. I too don't like Acids, but they are one of the best selling cigars on ccom. Someone is buying them!

    I've said this before, that's why they make more than one type of cigar. It's fun trying different brands and seeing what we like. I know when I frist started on man made cigars, I was really into the mild ones, now I smoke them rarely. I enjoy the fuller ones much more now, but I still go back to the mild ones from time to time.

    That's what makes this hobby so much fun, we all have different tastes and we love to talk about them!

  • youngryan216
    youngryan216 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭
    I don't think the Acid guys are forum guys. Different demographic. I could be wrong.
    ISO Ramrod and Ron Mexico
  • jarubla
    jarubla Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Necro post for a good read.

    So far, for me, bad cigars have been construction based. Some are more bland than others, for sure.

    I have not yet had the three year old butterscotch candy on a nasty bar experience yet. 

    Have smoked a few which were mediocre at best: ghurka (a buddy calls them the pickle cigar, aka gurkhin) and RP. 

    -Jay
    “There’ll be two dates on your tombstone and all your friends will read ’em but all that’s gonna matter is that little dash between ’em.” -Kevin Welch
  • YankeeMan
    YankeeMan Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is the great thing about cigars.  I'm sure every cigar mentioned here is someone else's favorite.  So many cigars, so little time!
  • SecretSquirrel
    SecretSquirrel Posts: 864 ✭✭✭✭
    Oh man, this is a tough one.. I'd have to say anything infused is def at the bottom of my list. My uncle loves the **** outta these disgusting copper label somethin or others that taste like way too much caramel to stomach. Bottom of the list for a normal cigar would be the la historia. It was a strait up salt lick both times I tried it. I figured the first time it was just a bad stick.. But no. So very salty. And a close second would be the tatuaje brown label. It tasted like a beef stick from 7 eleven. Not even kidding
  • jsnake
    jsnake Posts: 5,979 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2015
    Nevermind already been here
  • jsnake
    jsnake Posts: 5,979 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Krieg said:
    jsnake:
    Every Padron cigar I have ever had. Taste like a cat crapped in a cigarette ashtray at Rosie O'Donnel's house which was left in her sweaty underwear drawer. Blah Accckkkkk Thhhhhptttt
    Ouch! LOL! Ever tried the 1926 80th anniv?
    Nope. Definitely never spending money on their high end stuff after my experience with them.
  • bripper
    bripper Posts: 74 ✭✭
    MUWAT Fat Molly left a nasty taste for days
  • CAcigarguy007
    CAcigarguy007 Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm sure some of the old timers will remember the Cremosa! That was legendarily bad. The most recent (like 3-4 years or so ago) was a Nicarao bundle that I think was actually worse than the Cremosa! I attempted to smoke 3 and each was worse than the last (horrid comes to mind) as I only got a few puffs in. The other 18 went into the trash. Worst money I ever spent! 
     
  • CAcigarguy007
    CAcigarguy007 Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭✭✭
    jsnake:
    Every Padron cigar I have ever had

    ^^^^^BLASPHEMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!