Best Of

I'm beginning to think there is lot of post attachment syndrome lately.

1980s CARL ZEISS GERMAN PANTHER TANK SIGHT
ITM#E9987P1
$49,500.00

@Amos_Umwhat said:

@Vision said:

@Amos_Umwhat said:

@Vision said:

@Amos_Umwhat said:
Um, because it was obvious to everyone that you were responding to the references in Calvin's post?

Just my guess, I can't really respond for Todd.

Meanwhile, the clash of the Titan Egos did seem inevitable, didn't it?

Now there is a quote button at the bottom of the post. Sort of like the one I used here. If I was responding to his post, I would've used said button and in fact quoted him. But alas, I did not so I was not responding to his post. I was making a general statement as this is about to get good. But obviously it was so obvious to you that obviously that you knew I was obviously being obvious , obviously. Obviously, this is obvious.

If you'll check, obviously, I was not alone in making that guess. Obviously. But, as I didn't 't quote you, what made you think I was referring to your post? By your 'logic' above I couldn't have been. Unless, of course, it was obvious. I think the answer is obvious. Obviously. To everyone but one person.

Obviously is obvious to me that obviously you're triggered by any of my posts obviously.

No, not at all. I've also come to understand that conversation with you is not fruitful. You're like a politician, this is just another example. If a rule helps your point, it's a rule and must be obeyed. If the same rule provably disputes your point, well then it doesn't count. There is no solid ground that you stand on. No truth to be found. Therefore, you have no grasp of logic and cannot be reasoned with.

You're often very funny, both intentionally and unintentionally. Many times you make the comment about something that came to my mind when faced with the situation. You're not stupid, but you're still just a very small troll. There's no being "triggered" by such an insignificant voice. It would be silly.

That's offensive my man. I may be short in stature but I am not a "small" troll.

@Vision said:

@Amos_Umwhat said:

@Vision said:

@Amos_Umwhat said:
Um, because it was obvious to everyone that you were responding to the references in Calvin's post?

Just my guess, I can't really respond for Todd.

Meanwhile, the clash of the Titan Egos did seem inevitable, didn't it?

Now there is a quote button at the bottom of the post. Sort of like the one I used here. If I was responding to his post, I would've used said button and in fact quoted him. But alas, I did not so I was not responding to his post. I was making a general statement as this is about to get good. But obviously it was so obvious to you that obviously that you knew I was obviously being obvious , obviously. Obviously, this is obvious.

If you'll check, obviously, I was not alone in making that guess. Obviously. But, as I didn't 't quote you, what made you think I was referring to your post? By your 'logic' above I couldn't have been. Unless, of course, it was obvious. I think the answer is obvious. Obviously. To everyone but one person.

Obviously is obvious to me that obviously you're triggered by any of my posts obviously.

No, not at all. I've also come to understand that conversation with you is not fruitful. You're like a politician, this is just another example. If a rule helps your point, it's a rule and must be obeyed. If the same rule provably disputes your point, well then it doesn't count. There is no solid ground that you stand on. No truth to be found. Therefore, you have no grasp of logic and cannot be reasoned with.

You're often very funny, both intentionally and unintentionally. Many times you make the comment about something that came to my mind when faced with the situation. You're not stupid, but you're still just a very small troll. There's no being "triggered" by such an insignificant voice. It would be silly.

IS WACK

I sent this to my son in laws. My daughters were not very happy.

@Amos_Umwhat said:

@Vision said:

@Amos_Umwhat said:
Um, because it was obvious to everyone that you were responding to the references in Calvin's post?

Just my guess, I can't really respond for Todd.

Meanwhile, the clash of the Titan Egos did seem inevitable, didn't it?

Now there is a quote button at the bottom of the post. Sort of like the one I used here. If I was responding to his post, I would've used said button and in fact quoted him. But alas, I did not so I was not responding to his post. I was making a general statement as this is about to get good. But obviously it was so obvious to you that obviously that you knew I was obviously being obvious , obviously. Obviously, this is obvious.

If you'll check, obviously, I was not alone in making that guess. Obviously. But, as I didn't 't quote you, what made you think I was referring to your post? By your 'logic' above I couldn't have been. Unless, of course, it was obvious. I think the answer is obvious. Obviously. To everyone but one person.

Obviously is obvious to me that obviously you're triggered by any of my posts obviously.