Why the gun grabber crowd will never win
xmacro
Posts: 3,402 ✭
Well, I'm a bit drunk on some Stone Ruination IPA (yeah, I'm a hop head), so I figured I'd make a drunk post and exercise my 1st amendment rights by saying "f*ck you" to the ass who just got inaugurated since it seems the 1st A is sacred, but the 2nd A is expendable. Whatever. When they come to take your guns, just head to your local hardware store and grab a shovel.
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/179192-DIY-Shovel-AK-photo-tsunami-warning/
Did they take the shovel AK? Shiiiiiiiit son, you just gotta up the ante. How 'bout an RPG-7 shotgun? You can even use Joe Biden's POS
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/186266-Bearpup-Trilogy-I-%E2%80%93-Unexpected-Shotgun-(photo-calypse-warning)
It's versatile too; you can shoot it in the pool:
Over your head
Get some street cred by shooting it ghetto style:
Say "what" one more time, motherf*cker. I dare ya. I double dare ya, say "what" one more time
From the article:
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/179192-DIY-Shovel-AK-photo-tsunami-warning/
Did they take the shovel AK? Shiiiiiiiit son, you just gotta up the ante. How 'bout an RPG-7 shotgun? You can even use Joe Biden's POS
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/186266-Bearpup-Trilogy-I-%E2%80%93-Unexpected-Shotgun-(photo-calypse-warning)
It's versatile too; you can shoot it in the pool:
Over your head
Get some street cred by shooting it ghetto style:
Say "what" one more time, motherf*cker. I dare ya. I double dare ya, say "what" one more time
From the article:
On this Thanksgiving Day, let me say this: God Bless America the only country on this **** planet where you still have the freedom to build AKs in defense of Motherland! The only country where a *** shovel can become an awesome weapon of death and destruction.
Do you love gardening, do you have a tool shed?
Please be aware that hiding in your garage, there may be dozens of Killy, high-clip-capacitated, school-penetrating, children-hating, Assault Weapons of mAss Destruction! Please send this message to all your libtard friends to make sure that they call 911 when they encounter anything that looks like a shovel. Thousands of hardware and home improvement stores are selling AKs through the "shovel" loophole to anyone!
Ask a Soviet engineer to design a pair of shoes and hell come up with something that looks like the boxes that the shoes came in; ask him to make something that will massacre Germans, and he turns into Thomas **** Edison. ? Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
0
Comments
Ft Hood ~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim.
Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.
Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat.
Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.
Connecticut School Shooter- ~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians.
Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats."
INTERESTING, isn't it ?.............
If they manage to ban the black-evil-assault-weapons that shoot infant-skull-seeking bullets, then they'll eventually go after handguns (V-Tech shooter used handguns to kill 32 and injure 17, quite a bit more than Newtown). When that doesn't stop things, they'll go after every gun. When that doesn't stop the murders, then they'll keep going still. For a look at what the UK, a notorious gun control State does, check this out:
Think about this for a second. First it's rifles, then it's handguns, then it's cleavers, and then it's butter knives. According to the placard, the UK has had that law since 1996 - 17 years. The Left will never stop trying to ban everything and trying to institute their idea of utopia through forceful legislation
For more fun, check this out. For maximum rage, skip to the 3:00 minute mark - cops are trolling social network sites and find someone with a "russian style bat and russian style hat" - looks pretty evil, let's get 'em (I sh*t you not, they're going to arrest someone for having their picture taken with a "russian style bat and russian style hat")
Link for those who can't see the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUCRamTAJEY
Eric Rudolph......Olympic Park Bomber (in addiiton to other killings) a right wing religious fanatic doing gods will
Michael Bray.....navy veteran and bomber 10 womens clinics and liberal advocasy groups
And as far as your facts. I dont know how the shooter in V.Tech (Cho) couldve been a registered deomcrat when he was not a U.S. citizen, but go ahead with it if you want, lol. We can all read snopes bro.
The fact is, the vast majority of gun crimes committed in the US are done with handguns. If your answer is to ban certain types of guns to cut down on gun crime, you can't do it without going after handguns.
And liberal that I am, I do believe that the 2nd amendment was meant to codify the legitimacy of both state militias and the right of individuals to own guns.This is in spite of the fact that my grandfather was shot and killed when I was 2 by someone robbing his store. The robber had legitimately purchased his gun. My grandfather had a gun under the counter everything happened to fast for him to have time to reach for it. So much for the deterrence factor.
I think that only a very small minority of people believe that gun ownership should be banned outright. It's certainly not a central plan of the Democratic party. Bill Clinton was a hunter. The Brady Bill was the brainchild of Ronald Reagan's advisor, not some left wing Democrat. Even President Obama has explicitly and publicly affirmed Second Amendment rights. The proposals around semi-automatic weapons and cartridges (which will never ever pass, and even Obama knows this) are not about banning gun ownership but about setting limits.
If you believe that there should be no restrictions on arms ownership of any kind, then any attempt to outlaw certain kinds of weapons is an attempt to restrict your 2nd amendment rights. However, if you do believe that some of the categories above should be illegal, then I would think you have to admit that your issue is not about stripping away your 2nd Amendement rights (the basic right to own and use arms) but about proposing the define the limits of arms ownership in a way that you don't agree with. Which is a perfectly legitimate position to have. Personally, I think it's a much more rationale and persuasive argument to say, "I believe that people should be able to own semi-automatic weapons, and I'm against the government trying to limit my right to own them" than to say "I'm against the government trying to limit my right to own semi-automatic weapons because it's the first step toward gutting my 2nd Amendment rights." But all of our rights are limited in some way or another. There's no first amendment protection for religions that practice polygamy or human sacrifice or for newspapers that advocate the violent overthrow of the government or for would-be terrorists who are caught with bomb plans or fund terrorist organizations. Even the post-9/11 paranoia hasn't resulted in the suppression of the rights of white supremacists and communists to organize and freely express their vile views. The 'slippery slope' of movement to a totalitarian state has happened yet, even when America was at its paranoid worst (during the McCarthy area in the 1950s and shortly after 9/11). And considering the huge political influence of gun owners, I don't think anyone has to worry about anything more than the background checking aspects of these proposals passing through Congress. even at that.
Girls shooting guns is always fun