Home Non Cigar Related

Political Discussions

1515253545557»

Comments

  • CalvinAndHoboCalvinAndHobo Posts: 3,104 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Vision said:
    @CalvinAndHobo I'm just going to ask. Am I looking at the singular, larger message of the meme or are we going with both messages? I can only assume you don't agree with the response in the meme as you have never led me to believe such.

    The gun meme is in reply to Nick Fuentes saying what he said. Then the second meme is separate. Thanks for asking for clarification.

  • VisionVision Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CalvinAndHobo I wasn't trolling. I just wanted to point that part out. I didn't think that was your sentiment.

  • CalvinAndHoboCalvinAndHobo Posts: 3,104 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Vision said:
    @CalvinAndHobo I wasn't trolling. I just wanted to point that part out. I didn't think that was your sentiment.

    I thought you were wondering if Nick Fuentes was the one who replied after the meme was posted. Nick posted that first, then the meme was posted in reply to him (which I agree with, if you try to assault someone, you get what's coming to you)

  • TRayBTRayB Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @VegasFrank said:

    @TRayB said:

    @Bob_Luken said:

    @TRayB said:
    This is YUUUUGGGGE. All 7 swing states.

    I knew the first five were over, just found out this morning that NV was called, and WTF are they doing in AZ, counting 1 ballot per day??

    Never understood the instant gratification crowd. Maybe it's a result of an on-demand world and maybe it's the result of a millennial or gen z mentality. These **** don't get sworn in until January. I'd rather have it slow and correct then fast and recounted.

    Besides, the complete vote is never counted within a couple of days or hours. It's always weeks after. Are people just realizing this now?

    Point taken. It's just a bit odd when 49 states are reporting 98-99% (meaning they still have some provisional and mail-in ballots to review and count) and 1 state is reporting 85% for several days after the election.

  • OutdoorsSmoke_21191OutdoorsSmoke_21191 Posts: 2,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TRayB said:

    @VegasFrank said:

    @TRayB said:

    @Bob_Luken said:

    @TRayB said:
    This is YUUUUGGGGE. All 7 swing states.

    I knew the first five were over, just found out this morning that NV was called, and WTF are they doing in AZ, counting 1 ballot per day??

    Never understood the instant gratification crowd. Maybe it's a result of an on-demand world and maybe it's the result of a millennial or gen z mentality. These **** don't get sworn in until January. I'd rather have it slow and correct then fast and recounted.

    Besides, the complete vote is never counted within a couple of days or hours. It's always weeks after. Are people just realizing this now?

    Point taken. It's just a bit odd when 49 states are reporting 98-99% (meaning they still have some provisional and mail-in ballots to review and count) and 1 state is reporting 85% for several days after the election.

    I think the average age of the pollsters in Arizona is probably 97 🤓

    A good cigar and whiskey solve most problems.

  • VegasFrankVegasFrank Posts: 18,074 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TRayB said:

    @VegasFrank said:

    @TRayB said:

    @Bob_Luken said:

    @TRayB said:
    This is YUUUUGGGGE. All 7 swing states.

    I knew the first five were over, just found out this morning that NV was called, and WTF are they doing in AZ, counting 1 ballot per day??

    Never understood the instant gratification crowd. Maybe it's a result of an on-demand world and maybe it's the result of a millennial or gen z mentality. These **** don't get sworn in until January. I'd rather have it slow and correct then fast and recounted.

    Besides, the complete vote is never counted within a couple of days or hours. It's always weeks after. Are people just realizing this now?

    Point taken. It's just a bit odd when 49 states are reporting 98-99% (meaning they still have some provisional and mail-in ballots to review and count) and 1 state is reporting 85% for several days after the election.

    In Nevada, ballots had to be postmarked by election day, and were due into the state on Friday. Then they have to verify each signature against the one on file with the state to ensure election integrity, despite what mass media says. It just takes time and when the race is close, this is what you get.

    Disclaimer:  All trolling is provided for the sole entertainment purposes of the author only. Readers may find entertainment and hard core truths, but none are intended. Any resulting damaged feelings or arse chapping of the reader are the sole responsibility of the reader, to include, but not limited to: crying, anger, revenge pørn, and abandonment or deletion of ccom accounts. Offer void in Utah because Utah is terrible.
  • silvermousesilvermouse Posts: 20,799 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Donald Trump Wins Arizona, Reversing the State’s Blue Trend
    Donald Trump triumphed in Arizona, winning all seven battleground states and bringing his final Electoral College tally to 312.

  • ShawnOLShawnOL Posts: 9,517 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A great feeling, isn't it Edward?

    Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.

  • VegasFrankVegasFrank Posts: 18,074 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ShawnOL said:
    A great feeling, isn't it Edward?

    I'm rooting for the plane and/or the clogged artery.

    Disclaimer:  All trolling is provided for the sole entertainment purposes of the author only. Readers may find entertainment and hard core truths, but none are intended. Any resulting damaged feelings or arse chapping of the reader are the sole responsibility of the reader, to include, but not limited to: crying, anger, revenge pørn, and abandonment or deletion of ccom accounts. Offer void in Utah because Utah is terrible.
  • OutdoorsSmoke_21191OutdoorsSmoke_21191 Posts: 2,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @VegasFrank said:

    @ShawnOL said:
    A great feeling, isn't it Edward?

    I'm rooting for the plane and/or the clogged artery.

    @VegasFrank I'm super surprised you didn’t say bullet 🤐🫣

    A good cigar and whiskey solve most problems.

  • VegasFrankVegasFrank Posts: 18,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 12

    @OutdoorsSmoke_21191 said:

    @VegasFrank said:

    @ShawnOL said:
    A great feeling, isn't it Edward?

    I'm rooting for the plane and/or the clogged artery.

    @VegasFrank I'm super surprised you didn’t say bullet 🤐🫣

    I don't want to be put on a watch list but I wouldn't be heartbroken. Also anything that happened in pulp fiction would be acceptable.

    Disclaimer:  All trolling is provided for the sole entertainment purposes of the author only. Readers may find entertainment and hard core truths, but none are intended. Any resulting damaged feelings or arse chapping of the reader are the sole responsibility of the reader, to include, but not limited to: crying, anger, revenge pørn, and abandonment or deletion of ccom accounts. Offer void in Utah because Utah is terrible.
  • dirtdudedirtdude Posts: 5,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow

    A little dirt never hurt
  • StubbleStubble Posts: 8,984 ✭✭✭✭✭

    https://apnews.com/article/new-york-migrant-bus-lawsuit-texas-1c8e515f9c57d50dbbd66606f995ec24#

    New York City can’t use an unconstitutional, two-century-old “anti-pauper” law to block the state of Texas from offering migrants free bus rides to the city from the southern border, a state judge has ruled.

    Hey, you gonna eat the rest of that corndog?
  • VisionVision Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 3:32AM

    @Stubble said:
    https://apnews.com/article/new-york-migrant-bus-lawsuit-texas-1c8e515f9c57d50dbbd66606f995ec24#

    New York City can’t use an unconstitutional, two-century-old “anti-pauper” law to block the state of Texas from offering migrants free bus rides to the city from the southern border, a state judge has ruled.

    Im not that great with geography but isn't Mexico closer to Texas than New York? Last time I checked it was but I wasn't sure if Texas had moved. Seems like a smarter and probably (if Texas didn't move) cheaper option to give free bus rides south than north.

  • StubbleStubble Posts: 8,984 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 4:40AM

    One of the reasons your girl lost!
    @Vision

    Hey, you gonna eat the rest of that corndog?
  • VisionVision Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Stubble said:
    One of the reasons your girl lost!
    @Vision

    Not my girl bruh. My registration says (R). And the Tangerine Tinted Taint Tickler isn't my guy either. I voted for a milanesa torta.

    Free bus rides.... when the government says "free" doesn't that really mean "tax payer dollars"?

  • StubbleStubble Posts: 8,984 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Texas taxes. You have no say in those. We paid to make it other peoples issues too. It worked. Maverick County went red for the first time since 1928.

    Hey, you gonna eat the rest of that corndog?
  • Bob_LukenBob_Luken Posts: 10,709 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 11:51AM

    @Vision said:

    @Stubble said:
    https://apnews.com/article/new-york-migrant-bus-lawsuit-texas-1c8e515f9c57d50dbbd66606f995ec24#

    New York City can’t use an unconstitutional, two-century-old “anti-pauper” law to block the state of Texas from offering migrants free bus rides to the city from the southern border, a state judge has ruled.

    Im not that great with geography but isn't Mexico closer to Texas than New York? Last time I checked it was but I wasn't sure if Texas had moved. Seems like a smarter and probably (if Texas didn't move) cheaper option to give free bus rides south than north.

    Seems like a great idea but a state, (instead of the feds) deporting illegals from the country would trigger a whole lot of extra conflict. There are probably prohibitions against it already. But I like the idea.

  • silvermousesilvermouse Posts: 20,799 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • Amos_UmwhatAmos_Umwhat Posts: 8,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 3:39PM

    If I recall, New York voters were all for "sanctuary", as long as it was Texas providing the sanctuary.

    I could be wrong, I suppose, but it seems to me that if New York voters were all for it, well then, wouldn't they want to be part of the miracle? They should be thanking Texas for the opportunity.

    WARNING:  The above post may contain thoughts or ideas known to the State of Caliphornia to cause seething rage, confusion, distemper, nausea, perspiration, sphincter release, or cranial implosion to persons who implicitly trust only one news source, or find themselves at either the left or right political extreme.  Proceed at your own risk.  

    "If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed.  If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." --  Mark Twain
  • VisionVision Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 3:44PM

    @Amos_Umwhat said:
    If I recall, New York voters were all for "sanctuary", as long as it was Texas providing the sanctuary.

    Anything to back up that statement or is that just conjecture?

    Edit: and I will add this. If there is evidence that a state is voting for sanctuary, but does not provide it or deems other states to require the same, even though said state may not want it… I would say that's pretty effed up of New York.

  • d_bladesd_blades Posts: 3,967 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Vision said:

    @Amos_Umwhat said:
    If I recall, New York voters were all for "sanctuary", as long as it was Texas providing the sanctuary.

    Anything to back up that statement or is that just conjecture?

    Edit: and I will add this. If there is evidence that a state is voting for sanctuary, but does not provide it or deems other states to require the same, even though said state may not want it… I would say that's pretty effed up of New York.

    From a quick Google search, sanctuary status seems to be either from executive order or thru legislative action, voters haven't been involved.

    Don't let the wife know what you spend on guns, ammo or cigars.

  • ShawnOLShawnOL Posts: 9,517 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Then these politicians should have to answer to their constituents for turning their cities into third world hell holes.

    Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.

  • VisionVision Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 4:40PM

    @d_blades said:

    @Vision said:

    @Amos_Umwhat said:
    If I recall, New York voters were all for "sanctuary", as long as it was Texas providing the sanctuary.

    Anything to back up that statement or is that just conjecture?

    Edit: and I will add this. If there is evidence that a state is voting for sanctuary, but does not provide it or deems other states to require the same, even though said state may not want it… I would say that's pretty effed up of New York.

    From a quick Google search, sanctuary status seems to be either from executive order or thru legislative action, voters haven't been involved.

    Voting could be interchanged with mandating. Wording does matter. That's on me. If it is done through legislation, I'm assuming that is through some sort of vote.

Sign In or Register to comment.