Corona Virus Vaccine
Would you take or be administered any Corona Virus Vaccine? There are 6 options to cover different opinions, instead of just no or yes. Also this is just a poll nothing more nothing less.
Corona Virus Vaccine 29 votes
8 votes
12 votes
2 votes
4 votes
1 vote
2 votes
Comments
-
Yes ASAP
Sure. The Army injected me with whatever they felt appropriate, lots of injections, and I'm not dead yet.
WARNING: The above post may contain thoughts or ideas known to the State of Caliphornia to cause seething rage, confusion, distemper, nausea, perspiration, sphincter release, or cranial implosion to persons who implicitly trust only one news source, or find themselves at either the left or right political extreme. Proceed at your own risk.
"If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed. If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." -- Mark Twain3 -
Too soon to say. I'm not going to be the first to take the vaccine, there's others that need it more than I do, I feel, but I don't think I'd wait a year. Need more info. Can you still be a carrier if your vaccinated?
Join us on Zoom vHerf (Meeting # 2619860114 Password vHerf2020 )2 -
Don’t think I’ll have a lot of choice. I just hope there’s no side affects later on.
0 -
Yes ASAP
There are side effects (in the tests people were told to take acetaminophen every 6 hours....) but my wife and I will put up with that over possibly dying in some hospital.
0 -
Yes 1 Year After Vaccine Release
Always been a bit of a procrastinator.
I know, You're a big dog and I'm on the list.
Let's eat, GrandMa. / Let's eat GrandMa. -- Punctuation saves livesIt'll be fine once the swelling goes down.
0 -
No Not Ever
I wanted to clarify after reading comments (can't edit 1 hour),
"No 1 or 5 Years After Vaccine Release" still means your open to the idea of being vaccinated but you may believe it's to soon still or skeptical of long term side effects etc. I could have put 10 or the max for voting choices but that might confuse people including my self lol.If you quote me do the @TX98Z28 in your text or I won't be notified of your quote, Thanks.0 -
@silvermouse said:
There are side effects (in the tests people were told to take acetaminophen every 6 hours....) but my wife and I will put up with that over possibly dying in some hospital.I can deal with that too, I am talking long term down the road.
0 -
Yes ASAP
Yes as me and my other are high risk status.
0 -
No 1 Year After Vaccine Release
I voted 1 year after.
I say that, because when the pneumonia shot came out, I waited longer than I should have to get the shot and I paid for it.
The 2 years previous to getting the pneumonia shot, I was down twice with pneumonia, mostly because of the conditions I work in.IF the vaccine is mandatory, I will likely fight having it done.
I hate being told I have to do something. So if it is mandatory, I will likely put it off as long as possible to see the real information on it.If it is not mandatory, I may look into getting it when I feel it is necessary.
In Fumo Pax
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy cigars and that's close enough.Wylaff said:Atmospheric pressure and crap.0 -
It depends. I've seen projections of it costing americans 10s of thousands for this shot. I've already got the damn virus. I survived. I will not go bankrupt to pay for it. If it's offered in a walk-in clinic like the flu shot, yeah, I'll get it.
"Cooking isn't about struggling; It's about pleasure. It's like sǝx, with a wider variety of sauces."
At any given time the urge to sing "In The Jungle" is just a whim away... A whim away... A whim away...0 -
No Not Ever
Depends what the girl with the needle looks like.
Trapped in the People's Communist Republic of Massachusetts.
3 -
Yes ASAP
If I wasn't considered high risk myself, I probably would have intentionally tried to get the coronavirus once my job sent everyone to work from home, just to get it out of the way. Aside from being diabetic, I'm young and in shape so if my immune system was normal I would have been fine, and it would have been the easiest time to self isolate. A vaccine is just a controlled way of doing that, and the whole point of vaccines is to achieve herd immunity. I don't quite understand why people who believes that herd immunity needs to be the end goal, would oppose vaccines. Maybe someone on the other side could help explain it to me? Is it the Bill Gates microchip thing? (everyone already carries a phone around, Bill Gates is all set in terms of spying on us as it is). Are people worried the vaccine (aka, a controlled small dose of the virus) could be worse than the virus itself?
4 -
Yes ASAP
Two high riskers in my house. Fùck it...if you're man enough to be willing to get Corona, you should be man enough to get the vaccine for it, unless you're one of those bare bulb burning conspiracy theorists who thinks the government is trying to inject you with a nano robot (JD).
@ScotchnSmoke sux lots of large wéiners. And tons of small ones.5 -
Yes ASAP
And that girl has some kind of fùcked up arm. And either it's really hairy or it's really not hairy, either way it's creepy.
@ScotchnSmoke sux lots of large wéiners. And tons of small ones.1 -
No Not Ever
@VegasFrank said:
And that girl has some kind of fùcked up arm. And either it's really hairy or it's really not hairy, either way it's creepy.
It's not the arm nor person that scares me in that picture.
If you quote me do the @TX98Z28 in your text or I won't be notified of your quote, Thanks.0 -
No Not Ever
It's not just because all government today is a corporate oligarchy, it's not because Fauci is a murdering criminal scumbag, it's not because the FDA will permit big pharma to peddle poisons because the class action lawsuit business is good for the economy and the profits always outweigh the risk, and it's certainly not because Americans are heavily medicated to the point at which they've lined up for flu vaccines in the past and have no idea what virus interference really is and how they are more susceptible to corona viruses.
No, it's simply a matter of principle for me. Also, because Sweden. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. If something kills you, then the weak perish and the people who remain are stronger and can continue the gene medley parade. I've never really been a Darwin fan, but this is one aspect he got right."Love is a dung heap, Betty and I am but a c.o.c.k. that climbs upon it to crow."2 -
@BKDog said:
I've never really been a Darwin fan, but this is one aspect he got right.We ardently believe in the theory of natural selection, but not in its practice.
My diabetic friends will say this is a good thing.
My many contemporaries who were prevented from becoming polio victims are now free to opine either way.“It has been a source of great pain to me to have met with so many among [my] opponents who had not the liberality to distinguish between political and social opposition; who transferred at once to the person, the hatred they bore to his political opinions.” —Thomas Jefferson (1808)
0 -
No Not Ever
@webmost said:
@BKDog said:
I've never really been a Darwin fan, but this is one aspect he got right.We ardently believe in the theory of natural selection, but not in its practice.
My diabetic friends will say this is a good thing.
My many contemporaries who were prevented from becoming polio victims are now free to opine either way.The day we can cure influenza is the day that statement will have merit. Treating a disease is not the same as curing, and when a vaccine is developed and works (such as for polio) it's a very good thing for those who survived. I see apples and oranges here, and my statement was regarding the natural process of the Old Man's Blessing, not every terminal illness. Certainly, we could argue over the right to life versus any affliction, but I would side with you one hundred percent -IF we actually had a healthcare system which worked. As it turns out, Rockefeller medicine is just another snake oil scam, and that's a very true statement considering the history of healthcare and the Rockefeller dynasty.
And then there's this:
"Love is a dung heap, Betty and I am but a c.o.c.k. that climbs upon it to crow."6 -
No Not Ever
Never! Politicians don't care how many people die. They only care about themselves and their agenda. Look at the governor of New York...enough said.
3 -
8 -
@Poker_Slob said:
Never! Politicians don't care how many people die. They only care about themselves and their agenda. Look at the governor of New York...enough said.Apparently the current republican politicians, they are willing to die for there agenda.
Don't let the wife know what you spend on guns, ammo or cigars.
0 -
0 -
Yes ASAP
nothing like a little fat-shaming to make one feel superior.
0 -
Yes ASAP
Fat shaming?
Or:
Stick your finger up your buttt in public shaming?
Are these really the same thing?
WARNING: The above post may contain thoughts or ideas known to the State of Caliphornia to cause seething rage, confusion, distemper, nausea, perspiration, sphincter release, or cranial implosion to persons who implicitly trust only one news source, or find themselves at either the left or right political extreme. Proceed at your own risk.
"If you do not read the newspapers you're uninformed. If you do read the newspapers, you're misinformed." -- Mark Twain3 -
Maybe she was almost rear ended pulling in the gas station and had to check if she **** herself.
2 -
Yes ASAP
She is probably pulling up her bunched panties, thought she was unobserved, and didn't realize she was being monitored by a security camera and some jerk decided it would be 'funny' to spread it around the world on the internet. Yes, it is fat shaming. If it was a lithe 17-year-old it would be voyeuristic and equally an embarrassing violation.
1
